Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756713›Full record

ArticleActas urologicas espanolas2022

[Online surgical education adopted among urology residency programs in response to COVID-19: A pilot study].

Z M Connelly, R Abou Ghayda, T Paneque, J Gómez Rivas, F Esperto, A Azzawe, J Orzel, M Kathrins, M E Ahmed, N Khater

Open access · greenAbstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Actas urologicas espanolas, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 55% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Z M ConnellyDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, Estados Unidos.
R Abou GhaydaUrology Institute, University Hospitals, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, Estados Unidos.
T PanequeDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, Estados Unidos.
J Gómez RivasDepartamento de Urología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, España.
F EspertoDepartment of Urology, Campus Biomedico, University of Rome, Roma, Italia.
A AzzaweDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, Estados Unidos.
J OrzelGeorgetown University Medical School, Washington, DC, Estados Unidos.
M KathrinsDepartment of Urology, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, Estados Unidos.
M E AhmedDepartment of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, Estados Unidos.
N KhaterDepartment of Urology, Louisiana State University Health Shreveport, Shreveport, LA, Estados Unidos.
Louisiana State University in Shreveport · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCase Western Reserve University · USGeorgetown University · USHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESMayo Clinic · USUniversità Campus Bio-Medico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To understand the residents' perceptions of the, COVID-19 driven, newly implemented online learning systems adopted among accredited urology residency programs nationwide, and their sustainability following the pandemic era. Materials and methods: A survey was designed and dispersed to urology program coordinators and directors to distribute to their residents.In the survey, online education models was the all-encompassing term to describe any form of resident education that occurred online. Anonymous surveys were exported from Survey Monkey and data was analyzed for statistical significance. Results: Over 70% of urology residents agreed or were neutral to the statement that online education models were equivalent to in-person learning. Only 13% of residents stated that online learning should not be continued following the pandemic. Several different parameters were assessed, and only 5 of them showed statistical significance. Stress, personal engagement, interpersonal communication efficiency and non-verbal cues were all lower with online education models. The only attribute that was scored higher by residents was network connectivity issues. Conclusions: An overwhelming majority of urology residents in the United States believe online education models should continue to be adopted once the pandemic is over.

Indexed as

COVID-19Education sustainabilityOnline education modelsUrology resident satisfactionUrology residents’ education

Identifiers

PMID35756713
PMCPMC9212569
OpenAlexW4282020331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.