Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756658›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Two-Year Event-Free Survival Prediction in DLBCL Patients Based on

Zsombor Ritter, László Papp, Katalin Zámbó, Zoltán Tóth, Dániel Dezső, Dániel Sándor Veres, Domokos Máthé, Ferenc Budán, Éva Karádi, Anett Balikó and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinician-driven automated data preprocessing in nuclear medicine AI environments.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Radiomics based onQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Clinical application ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Automated data preparation forFrontiers in oncology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Zsombor RitterDepartment of Medical Imaging, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
László PappMedical University of Vienna, Center for Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Vienna, Austria.
Katalin ZámbóDepartment of Medical Imaging, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Zoltán TóthUniversity of Kaposvár, PET Medicopus Nonprofit Ltd., Kaposvár, Hungary.
Dániel DezsőDepartment of Medical Imaging, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Dániel Sándor VeresDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Domokos MáthéDepartment of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Ferenc BudánInstitute of Transdisciplinary Discoveries, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Éva KarádiDepartment of Hematology, University of Kaposvár, Kaposvár, Hungary.
Anett BalikóCounty Hospital Tolna, János Balassa Hospital, Szekszárd, Hungary.
László PajorDepartment of Pathology, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Árpád Szomor1st Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Erzsébet SchmidtDepartment of Medical Imaging, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.
Hussain Alizadeh1st Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: For the identification of high-risk patients in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), we investigated the prognostic significance of Methods: Pre-treatment [ Results: The automated machine learning analysis of the Center 1 dataset revealed that the most important features for building 2-year EFS are as follows: max diameter, neighbor gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM) busyness, total lesion glycolysis, total metabolic tumor volume, and NGTDM coarseness. The predictive model built on the Center 1 dataset yielded 79% sensitivity, 83% specificity, 69% positive predictive value, 89% negative predictive value, and 0.85 AUC by evaluating the Center 2 dataset. Conclusion: Based on our dual-center retrospective analysis, predicting 2-year EFS built on imaging features is feasible by utilizing high-performance automated machine learning.

Indexed as

[18F]FDG PET/CTautomated machine learningDLBCLradiomicstumor imaging

Identifiers

PMID35756658
PMCPMC9216187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.