Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756657›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Reaching the "Hard-to-Reach" Sexual and Gender Diverse Communities for Population-Based Research in Cancer Prevention and Control: Methods for Online Survey Data Collection and Management.

Katie J Myers, Talya Jaffe, Deborah A Kanda, V Shane Pankratz, Bernard Tawfik, Emily Wu, Molly E McClain, Shiraz I Mishra, Miria Kano, Purnima Madhivanan and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Katie J MyersComprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Talya JaffeComprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Deborah A KandaComprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
V Shane PankratzComprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Bernard TawfikComprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Emily WuComprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Molly E McClainDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Shiraz I MishraComprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Miria KanoComprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Purnima MadhivananDepartment of Health Promotion Sciences, Mel & Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States.
Prajakta AdsulComprehensive Cancer Center, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
University of New Mexico · USNew Mexico Cancer Center · USPublic Health Research Institute Of India · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Around 5% of United States (U.S.) population identifies as Sexual and Gender Diverse (SGD), yet there is limited research around cancer prevention among these populations. We present multi-pronged, low-cost, and systematic recruitment strategies used to reach SGD communities in New Mexico (NM), a state that is both largely rural and racially/ethnically classified as a "majority-minority" state. Methods: Our recruitment focused on using: (1) Every Door Direct Mail (EDDM) program, by the United States Postal Services (USPS); (2) Google and Facebook advertisements; (3) Organizational outreach Results: A total of 27,369 flyers were distributed through the EDDM program and 436,177 impressions were made through the Google and Facebook ads. We received a total of 6,920 responses on the eligibility survey. For the 5,037 eligible respondents, we received 3,120 (61.9%) complete responses. Of these, 13% (406/3120) were fraudulent/suspicious based on research-informed criteria and were removed. Final analysis included 2,534 respondents, of which the majority (59.9%) reported hearing about the study from social media. Of the respondents, 49.5% were between 31-40 years, 39.5% were Black, Hispanic, or American Indian/Alaskan Native, and 45.9% had an annual household income below $50,000. Over half (55.3%) were assigned male, 40.4% were assigned female, and 4.3% were assigned intersex at birth. Transgender respondents made up 10.6% (n=267) of the respondents. In terms of sexual orientation, 54.1% (n=1371) reported being gay or lesbian, 30% (n=749) bisexual, and 15.8% (n=401) queer. A total of 756 (29.8%) respondents reported receiving a cancer diagnosis and among screen-eligible respondents, 66.2% reported ever having a Pap, 78.6% reported ever having a mammogram, and 84.1% reported ever having a colonoscopy. Over half of eligible respondents (58.7%) reported receiving Human Papillomavirus vaccinations. Conclusion: Study findings showcase effective strategies to reach communities, maximize data quality, and prevent the misrepresentation of data critical to improve health in SGD communities.

Indexed as

cancercancer preventioncancer screening (MeSH)gender identity (MeSH)recruitmentsexual orientation

Identifiers

PMID35756657
PMCPMC9213655
OpenAlexW4281785372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.