ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022
Introducing the New Surgical Robot HUGO™ RAS: System Description and Docking Settings for Gynecological Surgery.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06512480 (Implementation in Colorectal Surgery of a New Modular and Open Robotic Platform.Pilot Project.), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation in Colorectal Surgery of a New Modular and Open Robotic Platform.Pilot Project.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Emerging robotic platforms in gynecologic surgery: a systematic review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Pooled it
- The Hugo™ RAS system in gynecologic robotic surgery: a systematic review of current applications.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- Emerging multi-port soft tissue robotic systems: a systematic review of clinical outcomes.Journal of robotic surgery · 2024Pooled it
- Comparative operative performance of three robotic platforms in benign gynecologic surgery: a single-surgeon retrospective cohort study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Da VinciSurgical endoscopy · 2026Observational
- A systematic scoping review of Hugo™ RAS (robot-assisted surgery) docking concordance in gynecologic robotic surgery.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Robotic-Assisted Surgery for Colorectal Cancer Treatment in 2026: An Updated Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Port placement and patient-specific docking strategies for robotic hysterectomy with the Hugo™ RAS system: an international Delphi consensus.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2026Article
- Versius surgical system: tips and tricks for OR setting and port placement for pelvic surgery, our experience in a multi-robotic referral centre.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2025Article
- Initial experience with the Carina™ platform in robotic-assisted hysterectomy for gynecological malignant disease.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Robotic hernia repair with the novel HUGO robot system - An initial experience from a tertiary centre.Journal of minimal access surgery · 2025Article
- Comparative study between Hugo™ RAS and intuitive da Vinci Xi systems in different gynecologic surgeries: a single-institution perspective study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment: A Review.Cancer informatics · 2025Review
- Novel Minimally Invasive Surgical Approaches to Endometriosis and Adenomyosis: A Comprehensive Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- A multi-docking strategy for robotic LAR and deep pelvic surgery with the Hugo RAS system: experience from a tertiary referral center.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- Utility guideline and considerations for the novel Hugo™ RAS (robotic-assisted surgery) system in colorectal surgery: surgical outcomes and initial experience in a tertiary center.International journal of colorectal disease · 2024Article
- New horizons in gynecological surgery: first-year experience with HUGO™ robotic-assisted surgery system at two tertiary referral robotic centers.Updates in surgery · 2024Article
- Artificial urinary sphincter and female stress urinary incontinence over the past 50 years: a narrative review.Translational andrology and urology · 2024Review
- Comparison between DaVinciJournal of robotic surgery · 2024Article
- Robotic transversus abdominis release using HUGO RAS system: our initial experience.Surgical endoscopy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study provides a detailed description of the new HUGO™ RAS System and suggests docking settings for gynecological surgery. The system is composed of an "open" surgical console with an HD-3D passive display, a system tower, and four arm carts. Each arm has an extremely wide range of adaptability resulting from the numerous joints. The human cadaver labs were performed at the ORSI Academy between August and December 2021. All procedures were performed by two surgical teams, each composed of a high-volume surgeon experienced in robotic surgery, gynecologic oncology, and pelvic sidewall surgery, and one bedside assistant. Three main gynecological surgical scenarios were identified: standard pelvic surgery, pelvic sidewall surgery, and para-aortic/upper abdominal surgery. Concerning the port placement, the chosen options were called "straight" and "bridge"; instead, the so-called "compact" and "butterfly" configurations were identified for the arm cart positioning. Four cadavers were used to perform total hysterectomy, radical hysterectomy, pelvic exenteration, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and omentectomy. We performed several tests, identifying the best system configurations to draw the proper efficiency from the flexibility of the system in all gynecological surgical scenarios. The straight port placement seems to be adequate for standard pelvic surgery. The bridge trocar position is best to reach the deeper and lateral anatomical regions of the female pelvis. The compact and butterfly arm cart allocations are adequate for both straight and bridge port placement. When deep pelvic surgery was performed, the bedside assistant became more proficient by working with a standard laparoscopic instrument from an ancillary port placed in the left iliac fossa. The arm carts needed to be moved in an open manner, like for the proposed butterfly configuration. On the contrary, the compact disposition left enough space to assist from Palmer's point port. Several basic and advanced gynecological surgical procedures were performed and completed successfully without encountering any technical or surgical issue, the results obtained were judged sufficient to proceed with the clinical experience in daily practice. The HUGO™ RAS system is flexible and highly performative in various surgical scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.