Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756633›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

Introducing the New Surgical Robot HUGO™ RAS: System Description and Docking Settings for Gynecological Surgery.

Salvatore Gueli Alletti, Vito Chiantera, Giovanni Arcuri, Alessandro Gioè, Riccardo Oliva, Giorgia Monterossi, Francesco Fanfani, Anna Fagotti, Giovanni Scambia

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06512480 (Implementation in Colorectal Surgery of a New Modular and Open Robotic Platform.Pilot Project.), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06512480 recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Implementation in Colorectal Surgery of a New Modular and Open Robotic Platform.Pilot Project.

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorFundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat ValencianaRan2024 to 2027Enrolled40ConditionsColorectal SurgeryArmscolonic resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Da VinciSurgical endoscopy · 2026
    Observational
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Comparison between DaVinciJournal of robotic surgery · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Salvatore Gueli AllettiUnità Operativa Complessa (UOC) Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Vito ChianteraDepartment of Gynecologic Oncology, Aziende di Rilievo Nazionale di Alta Specializzazione Civico Di Cristina Benfratelli, Palermo, Italy.
Giovanni ArcuriUnità Operativa Complessa Tecnologie Sanitarie, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy.
Alessandro GioèObstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Riccardo OlivaObstetrics and Gynecology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
Giorgia MonterossiUnità Operativa Complessa (UOC) Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Francesco FanfaniUnità Operativa Complessa (UOC) Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Anna FagottiUnità Operativa Complessa (UOC) Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Giovanni ScambiaUnità Operativa Complessa (UOC) Ginecologia Oncologica, Dipartimento per la salute della Donna e del Bambino e della Salute Pubblica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides a detailed description of the new HUGO™ RAS System and suggests docking settings for gynecological surgery. The system is composed of an "open" surgical console with an HD-3D passive display, a system tower, and four arm carts. Each arm has an extremely wide range of adaptability resulting from the numerous joints. The human cadaver labs were performed at the ORSI Academy between August and December 2021. All procedures were performed by two surgical teams, each composed of a high-volume surgeon experienced in robotic surgery, gynecologic oncology, and pelvic sidewall surgery, and one bedside assistant. Three main gynecological surgical scenarios were identified: standard pelvic surgery, pelvic sidewall surgery, and para-aortic/upper abdominal surgery. Concerning the port placement, the chosen options were called "straight" and "bridge"; instead, the so-called "compact" and "butterfly" configurations were identified for the arm cart positioning. Four cadavers were used to perform total hysterectomy, radical hysterectomy, pelvic exenteration, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy, and omentectomy. We performed several tests, identifying the best system configurations to draw the proper efficiency from the flexibility of the system in all gynecological surgical scenarios. The straight port placement seems to be adequate for standard pelvic surgery. The bridge trocar position is best to reach the deeper and lateral anatomical regions of the female pelvis. The compact and butterfly arm cart allocations are adequate for both straight and bridge port placement. When deep pelvic surgery was performed, the bedside assistant became more proficient by working with a standard laparoscopic instrument from an ancillary port placed in the left iliac fossa. The arm carts needed to be moved in an open manner, like for the proposed butterfly configuration. On the contrary, the compact disposition left enough space to assist from Palmer's point port. Several basic and advanced gynecological surgical procedures were performed and completed successfully without encountering any technical or surgical issue, the results obtained were judged sufficient to proceed with the clinical experience in daily practice. The HUGO™ RAS system is flexible and highly performative in various surgical scenarios.

Indexed as

dockinggynecological surgeryHUGO™ RASradical hysterectomyrobotic-assisted surgery (RAS)robotics

Identifiers

PMID35756633
PMCPMC9218341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.