Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756578›Full record

ArticleOphthalmology science2021

Asymmetric Functional Impairment of ON and OFF Retinal Pathways in Glaucoma.

Alan W Kong, Marcus L Turner, Hoover Chan, Robert L Stamper, Benjamin F Arnold, Luca Della Santina, Yvonne Ou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmology science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Astrocytes in the mouse brain respond bilaterally to unilateral retinal neurodegeneration.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Retinal Ganglion Cell Subtypes and Their Vulnerability in Glaucoma.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alan W KongDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Marcus L TurnerDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Hoover ChanDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Robert L StamperDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Benjamin F ArnoldDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Luca Della SantinaDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Yvonne OuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
University of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Rapid-Prototyping and Design CoreP30EY002162 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI LAMBA, DEEPAK ASHOK · 1985 to 2024
$16.8M
Neuronal plasticity in glaucomaR01EY028148 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI OU, YVONNE · 2018 to 2022
$2.2M
NEI NIH HHS P30 EY002162NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028148
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate ON-pathway versus OFF-pathway dysfunction in glaucoma using handheld electroretinography (ERG) with a temporally modulated sinusoidal flicker stimulus. Design: Cross-sectional study. Participants: Fifty-nine participants accounting for 104 eyes, comprised of 19 control eyes, 26 glaucoma suspect eyes, and 59 glaucoma eyes. Methods: Participants underwent portable ERG testing, which included the photopic flash, photopic flicker, photopic negative response stimulus, ON-OFF stimulus, and a custom-written sinusoidal flicker stimulus that was modulated from 50 to 0.3 Hz. Main Outcome and Measures: The ERG response amplitudes were measured by the handheld ERG. For the custom-written sinusoidal flicker stimulus, we derived and compared the log10 first harmonic frequency response amplitudes. Patient discomfort and fatigue after ERG testing were rated on a scale from 1 to 5. Results: Baseline demographics were not significantly different between groups, except for ocular characteristics. Analysis was performed adjusting for participant age, sex, race, and dilation status, and the sinusoidal frequency responses were stratified at 10 Hz because higher frequencies are associated with the OFF-pathway, whereas lower frequencies are associated with the ON-pathway. After stratification, glaucoma eyes showed an adjusted decrease of 32.1% at frequencies of more than 10 Hz (95% confidence interval [CI], -51.8% to -4.1%; Conclusions: Our finding that glaucoma participants showed greater decreases in ERG response at higher frequencies supports the hypothesis that the OFF-pathway may be more vulnerable in human glaucoma. Using a handheld ERG device with a sinusoidal flicker stimulus may provide an objective assessment of visual function in glaucoma.

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyGlaucomaOFF-pathwayON-pathwayRetinal ganglion cellSinusoidal flicker

Identifiers

PMID35756578
PMCPMC9232180
OpenAlexW3162748114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.