Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756507›Full record

ArticleChemical science2022

GlyNet: a multi-task neural network for predicting protein-glycan interactions.

Eric J Carpenter, Shaurya Seth, Noel Yue, Russell Greiner, Ratmir Derda

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Predictions from deep learning propose substantial protein-carbohydrate interplay.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric J CarpenterDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada ratmir@ualberta.ca.
Shaurya SethDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada ratmir@ualberta.ca.
Noel YueDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada ratmir@ualberta.ca.
Russell GreinerDepartment of Computing Science, University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.
Ratmir DerdaDepartment of Chemistry, University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada ratmir@ualberta.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1365-6570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advances in diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, transfusion, and organ transplantation build on a fundamental understanding of glycan-protein interactions. To aid this, we developed GlyNet, a model that accurately predicts interactions (relative binding strengths) between mammalian glycans and 352 glycan-binding proteins, many at multiple concentrations. For each glycan input, our model produces 1257 outputs, each representing the relative interaction strength between the input glycan and a particular protein sample. GlyNet learns these continuous values using relative fluorescence units (RFUs) measured on 599 glycans in the Consortium for Functional Glycomics glycan arrays and extrapolates these to RFUs from additional, untested glycans. GlyNet's output of continuous values provides more detailed results than the standard binary classification models. After incorporating a simple threshold to transform such continuous outputs the resulting GlyNet classifier outperforms those standard classifiers. GlyNet is the first multi-output regression model for predicting protein-glycan interactions and serves as an important benchmark, facilitating development of quantitative computational glycobiology.

Identifiers

PMID35756507
PMCPMC9172296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.