Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756462›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Case Report: Rectal Perforation Secondary to a Toothbrush in an Elderly Man.

Karthigesu Aimanan, Soon Yee Lim, Ahmad Junaidi Ahmad Hamidi, Tiong How Chieng, Firdaus Hayati

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Karthigesu AimananDepartment of Surgery, Miri Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Soon Yee LimDepartment of Surgery, Miri Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Ahmad Junaidi Ahmad HamidiDepartment of Surgery, Miri Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Tiong How ChiengDepartment of Surgery, Sibu Hospital, Ministry of Health Malaysia, Sibu, Sarawak, Malaysia.
Firdaus HayatiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah, Malaysia.
Ministry of Health · MYSibu Hospital · MYUniversiti of Malaysia Sabah · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rectal foreign bodies often constitute an arduous diagnosis and perplexing management. A 72-year-old gentleman who is mentally sound was brought to the emergency department for severe epigastric pain of a 1-week duration. On examination, he was pyrexial and in sepsis. The abdomen was guarded. A digital rectal examination was normal. Erect chest radiography revealed air under the diaphragm and abdominal radiography showed neither dilated bowel nor foreign body. A diagnostic laparoscopy was performed which revealed a yellow hard rod-shaped foreign body at the pelvis. Upon conversion to midline laparotomy, the foreign body was found to be a toothbrush with intraperitoneal rectal perforation of 1 cm in length. The brush was removed and the perforation was repaired primarily. A diverting transverse loop colostomy was created. Rectal foreign bodies may cause life-threatening rectal injuries including lacerations, bleeding, perforation, and obstruction. It is deemed crucial that any patient with rectal foreign body demands an orderly approach with the intention of diagnosis, management, and post-extraction evaluation.

Indexed as

case reportforeign bodiespneumoperitoneumradiographyrectum

Identifiers

PMID35756462
PMCPMC9226368
OpenAlexW4281704480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.