ArticleComputational and mathematical methods in medicine2022
Automatic Identification of MALDI-TOF MS Database Using Classical
Article in Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate and expand the automatic identification and clustering of clinical Methods: Twenty-eight field isolated strains, identified by whole-gene sequencing analysis, were analyzed by MALDI-TOF MS, and the spectra obtained were used to replenish the internal database of the manufacturer. To evaluate and expand the robustness of the database, MALDI-TOF MS identified 91 clinical isolates (except those used for implementation). A distance tree based on mass spectrometry data is constructed to confirm similarity and clusters of each clinical Results: In this research, when we used the implemented Bruker Daltonics database in our laboratory, 91 clinical isolates were identified at the genus level (100%) and 93.4% were identified at the species level (85/91). We performed proteomics analysis and divided these 91 isolates into cluster I (2.2%) and cluster II (97.8%). The largest group is cluster II ( Conclusion: MALDI-TOF MS may present an attractive alternative to automatically confirm and cluster the fastidious bacteria difficult to culture. Extension of identification of the MALDI-TOF MS database is viably fast, more efficient, and alternative to conventional methods in confirming the classical Bordetella species. This strategy could promote the epidemiological and taxonomic research of this important pathogen.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.