ArticleSustainable cities and society2022
Evaluating risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection of the elderly in the public bus under personalized air supply.
Article in Sustainable cities and society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In developing countries, public transportation is the first choice for the elderly because of its convenience and cheapness. The high density population of public transportation increases the risk of passengers contracting infectious diseases, so it is extremely critical to determine healthy transportation systems to safeguard the health of passengers. The propagation characteristics of droplets in the ZK-type public bus were studied by computational fluid simulation employing the Realizable k-ε turbulence model and discrete phase model. The modified Wells-Riley model was used to quantitatively assess the infection risk of SARS-CoV-2 spread by droplets on the elderly. The risk assessment shows that when the personalized air supply angle is 30°, the number of infected passengers is the least, reaching 14, which shows that the infection risk of passengers can be reduced through the design of personalized air supply angle. Regardless of the angle of the personalized air supply, the rear seats are in a low-risk area. Therefore, it's recommended that elderly passengers choose the rear seats of the public bus during the epidemic to prevent being infected. This study can provide a reference for healthy transportation systems to construct a healthy environment inside the public bus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.