Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756362›Full record

ArticleSexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP2022

A mixed methods study of sexuality education experiences and preferences among bisexual, pansexual, and queer (bi+) male youth.

David Mata, Aaron K Korpak, Brianna Sorensen, Brian Dodge, Brian Mustanski, Brian A Feinstein

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sexuality research & social policy : journal of NSRC : SR & SP, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Are Queer Men Queering Consent? A Scoping Review of Sexual Consent Literature Among Gay, Bisexual, Trans, and Queer Men.International journal of sexual health : official journal of the World Association for Sexual Health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

David MataInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University.
Aaron K KorpakInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University.
Brianna SorensenLoyola University Chicago.
Brian DodgeCenter for Sexual Health Promotion, Indiana University Bloomington.
Brian MustanskiInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University.
Brian A FeinsteinRosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science.

Funding

Northwestern University Minority Health and Health Disparities Research Training (NU-MHRT)T37MD014248 · NIMHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI SIMON, MELISSA A. · 2019 to 2023
$1.4M
Understanding and reducing HIV risk behavior and substance use among self-identified bisexual adolescent menK08DA045575 · NIDA · ROSALIND FRANKLIN UNIV OF MEDICINE & SCI · PI FEINSTEIN, BRIAN · 2018 to 2022
$837k
NIDA NIH HHS K08 DA045575NIMHD NIH HHS T37 MD014248
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Bisexual male youth are more likely to engage in certain behaviors that contribute to HIV/STI transmission (e.g., substance use) than are heterosexual and gay male youth. However, sexuality education rarely addresses the unique needs of sexual minority youth, especially bisexual, pansexual, and queer (bi+) youth, and little is known about their sexuality education experiences and preferences. As such, the goal of this study was to examine bi+ male youth's experiences learning about sex and their preferences for sexuality education. Methods: In 2019, 56 bi+ male youth ages 14-17 were surveyed and interviewed about their sexuality education experiences and preferences. Participants identified as bisexual (64%), pansexual (27%), and queer (9%), were racially/ethnically diverse (39% white, 32% Latinx, 20% Black, 9% other races), and included cisgender (79%) and transgender (21%) male youth. Results: Participants described varied experiences with school-based sexuality education (e.g., none, abstinence only, covered sexual health in some way), but it rarely addressed their unique needs. They typically learned about sex by searching for information online and from sexually explicit media. Participants identified several topics they wanted to learn more about (e.g., sex with same-gender partners, anal sex, consent), but they typically believed they were prepared to have sex. Finally, some participants described benefits of tailoring sexuality education to their unique needs, while others described benefits of more inclusive programs. Conclusions and Policy Implications: Findings suggest that bi+ male youth do not receive adequate sexuality education to make informed decisions about safer sex, highlighting the critical need for reform.

Indexed as

adolescentsbisexualpansexualqueersex educationyouth

Identifiers

PMID35756362
PMCPMC9230504

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.