Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756358›Full record

ArticleStatistical analysis and data mining2022

Multi-scale affinities with missing data: Estimation and applications.

Min Zhang, Gal Mishne, Eric C Chi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Statistical analysis and data mining, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Min ZhangDepartment of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6221-7323
Gal MishneHalcıoğlu Data Science Institute, University of California, San Diego, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5287-3626
Eric C ChiDepartment of Statistics, Rice University, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4647-0895

Funding

UCSD Leading the Advancement of Underrepresented Neuroscientists for Change (LAUNCH) Faculty Development ProgramR25NS117367 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI Victoria B Risbrough, Joann Trejo · 2020 to 2026
$1.6M
Data-driven analysis for neuronal dynamic modelingR01EB026936 · NIBIB · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MISHNE, GAL · 2018 to 2020
$1.1M
Imputing Single Cell Rna Sequencing Data: Mathematical, Statistical And Computational ChallengesR01GM135928 · NIGMS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI CHI, ERIC C · 2019 to 2021
$696k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026936NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM135928NINDS NIH HHS R25 NS117367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many machine learning algorithms depend on weights that quantify row and column similarities of a data matrix. The choice of weights can dramatically impact the effectiveness of the algorithm. Nonetheless, the problem of choosing weights has arguably not been given enough study. When a data matrix is completely observed, Gaussian kernel affinities can be used to quantify the local similarity between pairs of rows and pairs of columns. Computing weights in the presence of missing data, however, becomes challenging. In this paper, we propose a new method to construct row and column affinities even when data are missing by building off a co-clustering technique. This method takes advantage of solving the optimization problem for multiple pairs of cost parameters and filling in the missing values with increasingly smooth estimates. It exploits the coupled similarity structure among both the rows and columns of a data matrix. We show these affinities can be used to perform tasks such as data imputation, clustering, and matrix completion on graphs.

Indexed as

kernelsmissing datapenalized estimation

Identifiers

PMID35756358
PMCPMC9216212

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.