Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756351›Full record

ArticleSAGE open medicine2022

Pressure ulcer prevention knowledge, practices, and their associated factors among nurses in Gurage Zone Hospitals, South Ethiopia, 2021.

Shegaw Tesfa Mengist, Haimanot Abebe Geletie, Bitew Tefera Zewudie, Agerie Ayinalem Mewahegn, Tamene Fetene Terefe, Baye Tsegaye Amlak, Betelhem Tadesse, Fisha Alebel GebreEyesus, Tadesse Tsehay, Mamo Solomon and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SAGE open medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shegaw Tesfa MengistDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1917-5471
Haimanot Abebe GeletieDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Bitew Tefera ZewudieDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0558-5119
Agerie Ayinalem MewahegnDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4653-9266
Tamene Fetene TerefeDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9487-9022
Baye Tsegaye AmlakDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Betelhem TadesseDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Fisha Alebel GebreEyesusDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Tadesse TsehayDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.
Mamo SolomonDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6326-0040
Bogale Chekole TemereDepartment of Nursing, College of Medicine and Health Science, Wolkite University (WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4366-2875
Shegaw Geze TenawDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University(WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7216-6283
Yibeltal MesfinDepartment of Midwifery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wolkite University(WKU), Wolkite, Ethiopia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7851-5213
Wolkite University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A pressure ulcer is a localized skin injury and underlying tissue, usually as a result of friction or pressure against the surface of the skin. The global mortality rate of pressure ulcers was above 60% for hospitalized patients who wait 1 year of hospital stay. Nurses are the primary responsible body and forefront line care providers for the prevention of pressure ulcers, so nurses' knowledge and practices are the major rollers to handling this preventable problem. Objective: To assess pressure ulcer prevention knowledge, practices, and their associated factors among nurses in Gurage Zone Hospitals, South Ethiopia, 2021. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Gurage Zone hospitals from May to June 2021. Data were collected using a structured self-administered paper questionnaire from 372 participants using a simple random sampling procedure, and the collected data were checked for their completeness and entered into Epi-data version 4.6 and exported to SPSS version 26 for analysis. Results: In this study, 176 (49%) of nurses have good knowledge and 210 (58.5 %) of nurses have good practices. Variables having masters and above (adjusted odds ratio = 2.075; confidence interval: 1.886, 4.861), using guideline (adjusted odds ratio = 1.617; confidence interval: 1.017, 2.572), and cooperativeness of patients (1.859; confidence interval: 1.066, 3.242) was significantly associated with nurses prevention knowledge. Being divorced (adjusted odds ratio = 3.002; confidence interval: 1.023, 4.219), degree nurse (adjusted odds ratio = 2.639; confidence interval: 1.388, 3.051), workload (adjusted odds ratio = 0.480; confidence interval: 0.245-0.939), unproportioned nurse to patient ratio (adjusted odds ratio = 0.480; confidence interval: 0.158-0.747), patient cooperativeness (adjusted odds ratio = 1.859; confidence interval: 1.066-3.242), and nurses having good knowledge (adjusted odds ratio = 1.684; confidence interval: 1.078-2.632) statistically significant with prevention practices. Conclusion: The overall level of pressure ulcer prevention knowledge and practice of nurses were good. Qualification of nurses' degree and above, use of pressure ulcer prevention guidelines, over workload, unproportionate nurse-to-patient ratio, and patient cooperativeness were statistically significant factors for pressure ulcer prevention knowledge and practices. Therefore, health managers should provide continuous professional development, and ensure proportionated nurse-to-patient ratio allocation policy.

Indexed as

EthiopiaGurage ZoneknowledgenursingpracticesPressure ulcer

Identifiers

PMID35756351
PMCPMC9218504
OpenAlexW4285298661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.