Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756239›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2022

Reduced Anxiety Associated to Adaptive and Mindful Coping Strategies in General Practitioners Compared With Hospital Nurses in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic Primary Care Reorganization.

Enrico Perilli, Matteo Perazzini, Danilo Bontempo, Fabrizio Ranieri, Dina Di Giacomo, Cristina Crosti, Simona Marcotullio, Stefano Cobianchi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Linking Life Aspirations to Functional Medical Conditions: A Goal Contents Theory Perspective.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Enrico PerilliPublic Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Matteo PerazziniPublic Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Danilo BontempoPublic Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Fabrizio RanieriPublic Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Dina Di GiacomoPublic Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Cristina CrostiOspedale Regionale San Salvatore dell'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Simona MarcotullioPublic Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Stefano CobianchiPublic Health, Life and Environmental Sciences, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
University of L'Aquila · ITSan Salvatore Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 pandemic imposed psychosocial stress increasing in frontline healthcare workers, who managed by responding with different coping strategies. General practitioners were targeted by an extraordinary increase in the demand for reception, diagnosis and treatment from all patients even if working in solo. In Italy, the emergency changed risk assumption and roles in between primary care, unraveling the emotional distress of general practitioners, who suffered not only for isolation, but also emotional threatens. In this correlational study we wanted to evaluate trait anxiety and stress as perceived by general practitioners working in individual ambulatory practice room, and by hospital ward nurses working in group, during a chronic phase (February-May 2021) of COVID-19 pandemic. Our hypothesis is that a different work social organization in clinic contest as for general practitioners compared with nurses could induce adaptive or non-adaptive coping to stress under emergency and mindful attitude could be crucial. A number of 37 general practitioners, and 36 nurses were taken from the sanitary district of ASL1 Avezzano-Sulmona-L'Aquila in Italy. For our analyses we used the Health Professions Stress and Coping Scale to assess the risk of burn-out, and detect the coping strategies. We also used the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised, investigating whether clinicians used an eventual mindful attitude to prevent anxiety and responding with adaptive coping strategies. General practitioners reported high levels of anxiety, associated to an increased use of emotional distress. Mindful attitude was protective for anxiety in both general practitioners and nurses. As anxiety increased, it was coped by increasing the demand for social support. This coping strategy correlated with emotional distress and when enhanced, it corresponded to avoidance of the problem. Mindful attitude addressed general practitioners to adaptive coping strategies as the solution of the problem. On the other side, nurses accepted the problem but addressed it to others, by avoiding solving it themselves as beyond their role and organizational responsibility. In conclusion, mindful attitude can prevent dysfunctional reactive behaviors among clinicians at the forefront of emergency and reduce emotional distress for isolation as suffered by general practitioners.

Indexed as

anxietycoping strategiesCOVID-19general practitionershospital nursesmindful

Identifiers

PMID35756239
PMCPMC9218856
OpenAlexW4281647691

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.