Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35756104›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2022

The psychological impact of quarantine due to COVID-19: A systematic review of risk, protective factors and interventions using socio-ecological model framework.

Eslavath Rajkumar, Anugraha Merin Rajan, Monica Daniel, R Lakshmi, Romate John, Allen Joshua George, John Abraham, Jee Varghese

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06247228 (A Co-created Digital Intervention to Reduce Home-office Workers' Sedentary Behaviour), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06247228 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Co-created Digital Intervention to Reduce Home-office Workers' Sedentary Behaviour: Protocol for the Click2Move Programme, a Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Vic - Central University of CataloniaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled200ConditionsSedentary BehaviourArmsClick2Move
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Perspectives of Advance Care Planning for Latinos During COVID-19.The American journal of hospice & palliative care · 2025
    Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Stuck in pandemic uncertainty: a review of the persistent effects of COVID-19 infection in immune-deficient people.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2024
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Eslavath RajkumarDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, India.
Anugraha Merin RajanDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Punjab, Bathinda, India.
Monica DanielDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, India.
R LakshmiDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, India.
Romate JohnDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, India.
Allen Joshua GeorgeHumanities and Applied Sciences, Indian Institute of Management Ranchi, Ranchi, Jharkhand, India.
John AbrahamSt. John's Medical College Hospital, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Jee VargheseDepartment of Psychology, Central University of Karnataka, Kalaburagi, India.
Central University of Karnataka · INCentral University of Punjab · INIndian Institute of Management Ranchi · INSt.John's Medical College Hospital · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Though quarantine is a pertinent control measure for the spread of COVID-19, it is equally important to consider its negative impacts, as it causes severe psychological, emotional, and financial problems not only for those who are quarantined but also for many others who are directly or indirectly connected to those who are quarantined. There appears to be a need to synthesise the available literature evidence on the psychological impact of quarantine experience, especially the multilevel risk factors that make individuals vulnerable to psychological impact and the protective factors to deal with the negative effects of quarantine. Objective: This systematic review attempted to identify the various psychological impacts associated with the experience of quarantine, the risk and protective factors and list out various psycho-social interventions that can minimise the risks and facilitate the protective factors associated with the experience of quarantine. Methods: A systematic search adhering to the PRISMA guidelines was performed in four databases PubMed, Scopus, PsycNet, Web of Science and 10518 articles related to COVID-19 and quarantine were obtained. After screening processes and quality assessment using standard checklist 74 articles that fulfilled the eligibility criteria were chosen for the final review. Findings: Individuals subjected to quarantine had anxiety, depression, post-traumatic stress symptoms, sleep problems, and somatic difficulties. Some of the key risk factors during quarantine are young age, female gender, low money, fear of infection, poor sleep quality, reduced physical activity, increased sedentary behaviours, and a lack of social support. Financial difficulties and stigma remained risk factors even after the quarantine period had ended. Key protective factors were coping skills, home based exercise, leisure, recreational activities, maintaining relationships using social media and availability of mental health services. The findings also highlight the necessity for tele mental health interventions to address the psychological effects of quarantine. Conclusion: Multilevel interventions are required to minimise the impact of risk factors and enhance protective factors.

Indexed as

COVID-19Health-protective factorsHealth risk factorsPandemicPsychological impactsQuarantineSocio-ecological model

Identifiers

PMID35756104
PMCPMC9212950
OpenAlexW4283119873

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.