Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755900›Full record

ArticleJournal of the advanced practitioner in oncology2022

COVID-19 Vaccine Effectiveness in Oncology Patients.

Rachel LA Costa

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the advanced practitioner in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 58% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel LA CostaUC San Diego Health, San Diego, California.
UC San Diego Health System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oncology patients are at greater risk of morbidity and mortality from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection than the general population. Patients with malignancies were prioritized in vaccine distribution to confer protection to a vulnerable population. However, immunocompromised patients were not included in the initial COVID-19 vaccine trials. Will patients with cancer mount an adequate serologic response to vaccination to be protected from COVID-19 infection? Overall, oncology patients had diminished antibody response to the COVID-19 vaccines compared with healthy patients. The patients with the lowest seroconversion rates were those who received anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody therapy, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy, stem cell transplantation, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Although the response may not be robust, expert organizations strongly recommend that oncology patients should pursue COVID-19 vaccination and booster to ensure some degree of protection from infection. Immunocompromised patients should continue to practice mask wearing, social distancing, and proper hand hygiene to minimize the risk of contracting COVID-19.

Identifiers

PMID35755900
PMCPMC9214963
OpenAlexW4281851315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.