Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755855›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2022

Coagulation test understanding and ordering by medical trainees: Novel teaching approach.

Nadia Gabarin, Martina Trinkaus, Rita Selby, Nicola Goldberg, Hina Hanif, Michelle Sholzberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nadia GabarinDepartment of Medicine, Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9664-7882
Martina TrinkausDepartment of Medicine St. Michael's Hospital University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Rita SelbyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology and Department of Medicine University Health Network and Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3051-4427
Nicola GoldbergDepartment of Medicine St. Michael's Hospital University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Hina HanifDepartment of Laboratory Medicine & Pathobiology St. Michael's Hospital University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.
Michelle SholzbergDepartment of Medicine St. Michael's Hospital University of Toronto Toronto Ontario Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1220-0301

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coagulation testing provides a prime opportunity to make an impact on the reduction of unnecessary laboratory test ordering, as there are clear indications for testing. Despite the prothrombin time/international normalized ratio and activated partial thromboplastin time being validated for specific clinical indications, they are frequently ordered as screening tests and often ordered together, suggesting a gap in understanding of coagulation. Methods: Based on a needs assessment, we developed an online educational module on coagulation for trainees, incorporating education on testing cost, specificity, and sensitivity. Fifty participating resident physicians and medical students completed a validated premodule quiz, postmodule quiz after completion of the module, and a latent quiz 3 to 6 months after to assess longer-term knowledge retention. Trainees provided responses regarding their subjective laboratory test-ordering practices before and after module completion. Results: The median premodule quiz score was 67% (n = 50; range, 24%-86%) with an increase of 24% to a median postmodule quiz score of 91% (n = 50; range, 64%-100%). There was evidence of sustained knowledge acquisition with a latent quiz median score of 89% (n = 40; range, 67%-100%). Trainees were more likely to consider the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of laboratory investigations before ordering them following completion of the educational module. Conclusions: Using the expertise of medical educators and incorporating trainee feedback, we employed a novel approach to the teaching of coagulation to maximize its approachability and clinical relevance. We found sustained knowledge retention regarding coagulation and appropriate coagulation test ordering, and a subjective change to trainee ordering habits following participation in our educational intervention.

Indexed as

coagulationINRlaboratorymedical studentsphysicians

Identifiers

PMID35755855
PMCPMC9204395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.