Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755817›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Enhanced-Sampling Simulations for the Estimation of Ligand Binding Kinetics: Current Status and Perspective.

Katya Ahmad, Andrea Rizzi, Riccardo Capelli, Davide Mandelli, Wenping Lyu, Paolo Carloni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Ligand-Induced Electronic Response Enables Predictive QM/MM Simulations.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. How residence time works in allosteric drugs.Current opinion in structural biology · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Rational Design of Ligands with Optimized Residence Time.ACS pharmacology & translational science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Katya AhmadComputational Biomedicine (IAS-5/INM-9), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Andrea RizziComputational Biomedicine (IAS-5/INM-9), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Riccardo CapelliDepartment of Applied Science and Technology (DISAT), Politecnico di Torino, Torino, Italy.
Davide MandelliComputational Biomedicine (IAS-5/INM-9), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Wenping LyuWarshel Institute for Computational Biology, School of Life and Health Sciences, The Chinese University of Hong Kong (Shenzhen), Shenzhen, China.
Paolo CarloniComputational Biomedicine (IAS-5/INM-9), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dissociation rate (

Indexed as

drug discoveryenhanced samplingkineticsmachine learningmolecular dynamicsparallel computingQM/MM

Identifiers

PMID35755817
PMCPMC9216551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.