Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755787›Full record

ArticleThe archives of bone and joint surgery2022

The Performances of Conventional Titanium and Silver-Coated Megaprostheses in Non-oncological and Post-oncological Patients: An Analysis of Infection Failures in 142 Patients.

Federico Sacchetti, Raphael Kilian, Francesco Muratori, Stephane Cherix, Lorenzo Foschi, Riccardo Morganti, Domenico Andrea Campanacci, Rodolfo Capanna

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Federico SacchettiDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy.
Raphael KilianDepartment of Ophtalmology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy.
Francesco MuratoriDepartment of Oncology and Surgery at Robotic Address of the Hospital Careggi University of Florence, Firenze FI, Italy.
Stephane CherixDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Lorenzo FoschiDepartment of Oncology and Surgery at Robotic Address of the Hospital Careggi University of Florence, Firenze FI, Italy.
Riccardo MorgantiDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy.
Domenico Andrea CampanacciDepartment of Oncology and Surgery at Robotic Address of the Hospital Careggi University of Florence, Firenze FI, Italy.
Rodolfo CapannaDepartment of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy.
University of Pisa · ITUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Megaprostheses are one of the preferred choices of reconstruction after tumor resection. Periprosthetic joint infections are one of the most serious complications of joint prostheses surgeries. In this study, our aim was to analyze the efficacy of silver-coated megaprostheses in reducing the risk of prosthesis-related infection. Methods: One hundred forty-two patients who had undergone implantation of a mega-endoprosthesis for non-neoplastic or post-neoplastic conditions were included in this retrospective study. The end-point of the survival analysis was the prosthesis failure due to infection. Results: Thirty-eight patients had undergone implantation of a silver-coated megaprosthesis and 104 patients a megaprosthesis without silver coating. The survival analysis showed an overall infection-free survival rate of 82.3% at five years and 61.9% at 10 years. Silver-coated prostheses had an HR of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.26-2.05; Conclusion: Implantation of a silver-coated mega-prosthesis in non-oncological patients did not significantly reduce the risk of prosthesis-related infection.

Indexed as

EndoprosthesisInfectionMegaprosthesisPeriprosthetic infectionSilverSilver-coated

Identifiers

PMID35755787
PMCPMC9194708
OpenAlexW4283657935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.