Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755784›Full record

ReviewThe archives of bone and joint surgery2022

Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing and Locked Plating for the Treatment of Periprosthetic Supracondylar Femur Fractures: A Meta-Analysis and Quantitative Review.

Vishaal Sakthivelnathan, Prabhudev Prasad Purudappa, Varatharaj Mounasamy, Sujit Kumar Tripathy, Akshay Goel, Senthil Nathan Sambandam

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The archives of bone and joint surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 52% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Vishaal SakthivelnathanUTMB School of Medicine, TX, USA.
Prabhudev Prasad PurudappaBoston VA Medical center, Boston, MA, USA.
Varatharaj MounasamyDallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Sujit Kumar TripathyAIIMS, Bhubaneswar, India.
Akshay GoelMarshall Health, Huntington, USA.
Senthil Nathan SambandamDallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Dallas VA Medical Center · USAll India Institute of Medical Sciences Bhubaneswar · INMarshall Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: As the prevalence of Total Knee Arthroplasty increases, there is still debate over the preferred method of treatment of supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fractures. The aim of this study was to compare two of the common methods of fixation: Locked Plating and Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing with respect to nonunion, delayed union and surgical revision rate. Methods: A comprehensive database search via Pubmed was conducted, yielding 16 eligible studies. Six of those studies were comparative and were used in the meta-analysis section. All 16 studies were used in the pooled sample analysis section. The primary outcome analyzed was nonunion and delayed union rate while the secondary outcome was the surgical revision rate. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by comparing incidences of nonunion and delayed union, and surgical revision rates among the studies. Results: The meta-analysis showed that there is no statistically significant difference among the two groups in terms of nonunion and delayed union rate (OR = 1.43, CI = 0.74, 2.74, Conclusion: Both locked plating and Retrograde Intramedullary Nailing are reliable options for treating supracondylar femoral fractures around Total Knee Arthroplasty. Locked plating demonstrated a trend towards decreased nonunion and delayed union rates and a significantly lower surgical revision rate in the meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Locked platingPeriprosthetic femoral fractureRetrograde intramedullary nailingTotal Knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID35755784
PMCPMC9194703
OpenAlexW3200834445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.