Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755757›Full record

SynthesisComputational intelligence and neuroscience2022

EEG-Based Epileptic Seizure Detection via Machine/Deep Learning Approaches: A Systematic Review.

Ijaz Ahmad, Xin Wang, Mingxing Zhu, Cheng Wang, Yao Pi, Javed Ali Khan, Siyab Khan, Oluwarotimi Williams Samuel, Shixiong Chen, Guanglin Li

RetractedOpen access · hybridAbstract readSystematic ReviewRetracted Publication
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
15.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 129 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. ECG-Based Semi-Supervised Anomaly Detection for Early Detection and Monitoring of Epileptic Seizures.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  13. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Memristive Neural Networks for Predicting Seizure Activity.Sovremennye tekhnologii v meditsine · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Ijaz AhmadCAS Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3974-2207
Xin WangCAS Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3352-6829
Mingxing ZhuShenzhen College of Advanced Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1204-118X
Cheng WangCAS Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Yao PiSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Javed Ali KhanDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Science and Technology, Bannu, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6205-6232
Siyab KhanInstitute of Computer Science and Information Technology, The University of Agriculture, Peshawar, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan.
Oluwarotimi Williams SamuelCAS Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1945-1402
Shixiong ChenCAS Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5868-6952
Guanglin LiCAS Key Laboratory of Human-Machine Intelligence-Synergy Systems, Shenzhen Institute of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9016-2617
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNHarbin Institute of Technology · CNSun Yat-sen University · CNThe University of Agriculture, Peshawar · PKUniversity of Science and Technology Bannu · PK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epileptic seizure is one of the most chronic neurological diseases that instantaneously disrupts the lifestyle of affected individuals. Toward developing novel and efficient technology for epileptic seizure management, recent diagnostic approaches have focused on developing machine/deep learning model (ML/DL)-based electroencephalogram (EEG) methods. Importantly, EEG's noninvasiveness and ability to offer repeated patterns of epileptic-related electrophysiological information have motivated the development of varied ML/DL algorithms for epileptic seizure diagnosis in the recent years. However, EEG's low amplitude and nonstationary characteristics make it difficult for existing ML/DL models to achieve a consistent and satisfactory diagnosis outcome, especially in clinical settings, where environmental factors could hardly be avoided. Though several recent works have explored the use of EEG-based ML/DL methods and statistical feature for seizure diagnosis, it is unclear what the advantages and limitations of these works are, which might preclude the advancement of research and development in the field of epileptic seizure diagnosis and appropriate criteria for selecting ML/DL models and statistical feature extraction methods for EEG-based epileptic seizure diagnosis. Therefore, this paper attempts to bridge this research gap by conducting an extensive systematic review on the recent developments of EEG-based ML/DL technologies for epileptic seizure diagnosis. In the review, current development in seizure diagnosis, various statistical feature extraction methods, ML/DL models, their performances, limitations, and core challenges as applied in EEG-based epileptic seizure diagnosis were meticulously reviewed and compared. In addition, proper criteria for selecting appropriate and efficient feature extraction techniques and ML/DL models for epileptic seizure diagnosis were also discussed. Findings from this study will aid researchers in deciding the most efficient ML/DL models with optimal feature extraction methods to improve the performance of EEG-based epileptic seizure detection.

Indexed as

Deep LearningEpilepsyAlgorithmsElectroencephalographyHumansSeizuresSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID35755757
PMCPMC9232335
OpenAlexW4283065622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.