Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755489›Full record

ArticleRevista de psiquiatria y salud mental

Psychological impact of COVID-19 lockdown on a population with serious mental illness. A prospective cohort study.

Borja Pedruzo, Ana Catalan, Claudia Aymerich, Marta Bordenave, Olatz Estevez, Diego Aurofio Gómez, Jon Herrero, María Laborda, Gonzalo Mancebo, Ania Martínez and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista de psiquiatria y salud mental. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Borja PedruzoPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Ana CatalanPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Claudia AymerichPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Marta BordenavePsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Olatz EstevezPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Diego Aurofio GómezPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Jon HerreroPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
María LabordaPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Gonzalo ManceboPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Ania MartínezPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Malein PachoPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Ana PaniaguaPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
José Luis PérezPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.
Miguel Ángel González-TorresPsychiatry Department, Basurto University Hospital, Bilbao, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: COVID-19 has spread worldwide since its appearance at the end of 2019. In Spain, 99-day long home confinement was set from March 15th 2020. Previous studies about events requiring situations of isolation suggested that mental health problems may occur among the general population and, more specifically, vulnerable groups such as individuals with serious mental illness (SMI). This study aims to assess the psychological effect of confinement in patients with mental illness admitted to an inpatient psychiatric unit. Method: In this longitudinal study, IDER (State-Trait Depression Inventory) and STAI (State-Trait Anxiety Inventory) questionnaires were used at two different times (at the beginning and after the lockdown) of the pandemic to evaluate the depression and anxiety symptoms, respectively, in a population of patients who had been previously admitted to the Psychiatry Unit of the Basurto University Hospital. Results: 95 participants completed the IDER questionnaire in the first measurement, with a mean score of 24.56 (SD = 8.18) for state and 23.57 (SD = 8.14) for trait. In the case of STAI, the mean score was 27.86 (SD = 15.19) for the state and 30.49 (SD = 14.71) for the trait. No differences between the first and the second time were found in anxiety and depression levels. People with personality disorders presented high levels of anxiety. Conclusions: Individuals with a personality disorder showed the highest scores in anxiety and depression. Nevertheless, strict confinement did not affect this population, despite the literature that evidences that the pandemic has worsened people's mental health with SMI.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19Mental healthSerious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID35755489
PMCPMC9212956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.