Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755417›Full record

ReviewPathology oncology research : POR2022

Use of Diagnostic Imaging Modalities in Modern Screening, Diagnostics and Management of Breast Tumours 1st Central-Eastern European Professional Consensus Statement on Breast Cancer.

Gábor Forrai, Eszter Kovács, Éva Ambrózay, Miklós Barta, Katalin Borbély, Zsolt Lengyel, Katalin Ormándi, Zoltán Péntek, Tasnádi Tünde, Éva Sebő

Abstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Monitoring Pharmacological Treatment of Breast Cancer with MRI.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  6. Comparison of [Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Gábor ForraiGÉ-RAD Kft., Budapest, Hungary.
Eszter KovácsGÉ-RAD Kft., Budapest, Hungary.
Éva AmbrózayMamma Egészségügyi Zrt., Budapest, Hungary.
Miklós BartaRoyal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, United Kingdom.
Katalin BorbélyNational Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Hungary.
Zsolt LengyelHamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar.
Katalin OrmándiUniversity of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary.
Zoltán PéntekMamma Egészségügyi Zrt., Budapest, Hungary.
Tasnádi TündeDr Réthy Pál Member Hospital of Békés County Central Hospital, Békéscsaba, Hungary.
Éva SebőKenézy Gyula University Hospital, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast radiologists and nuclear medicine specialists updated their previous recommendation/guidance at the 4th Hungarian Breast Cancer Consensus Conference in Kecskemét. A recommendation is hereby made that breast tumours should be screened, diagnosed and treated according to these guidelines. These professional guidelines include the latest technical developments and research findings, including the role of imaging methods in therapy and follow-up. It includes details on domestic development proposals and also addresses related areas (forensic medicine, media, regulations, reimbursement). The entire material has been agreed with the related medical disciplines.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreastDiagnostic ImagingEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMammographyMass Screeningbiopsybreast MRIbreast screeningbreast ultrasoundconventional nuclear medicinemammographyPET/CTSPECT/CT

Identifiers

PMID35755417
PMCPMC9214693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.