Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755176›Full record

ArticleMachine learning with applications2022

Prediction of chaotic time series using recurrent neural networks and reservoir computing techniques: A comparative study.

Shahrokh Shahi, Flavio H Fenton, Elizabeth M Cherry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Machine learning with applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. TheBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Shahrokh ShahiSchool of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States of America.
Flavio H FentonSchool of Physics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States of America.
Elizabeth M CherrySchool of Computational Science and Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332, United States of America.

Funding

Integrative High-Resolution Experimental and Multiscale Modeling of Arrhythmias to Optimize Low Energy Anti-fibrillation Pacing (LEAP)R01HL143450 · NHLBI · GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI Flavio H Fenton · 2018 to 2026
$3.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL143450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, machine-learning techniques, particularly deep learning, have outperformed traditional time-series forecasting approaches in many contexts, including univariate and multivariate predictions. This study aims to investigate the capability of (i) gated recurrent neural networks, including long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks, (ii) reservoir computing (RC) techniques, such as echo state networks (ESNs) and hybrid physics-informed ESNs, and (iii) the nonlinear vector autoregression (NVAR) approach, which has recently been introduced as the next generation RC, for the prediction of chaotic time series and to compare their performance in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and robustness. We apply the methods to predict time series obtained from two widely used chaotic benchmarks, the Mackey-Glass and Lorenz-63 models, as well as two other chaotic datasets representing a bursting neuron and the dynamics of the El Niño Southern Oscillation, and to one experimental dataset representing a time series of cardiac voltage with complex dynamics. We find that even though gated RNN techniques have been successful in forecasting time series generally, they can fall short in predicting chaotic time series for the methods, datasets, and ranges of hyperparameter values considered here. In contrast, for the chaotic datasets studied, we found that reservoir computing and NVAR techniques are more computationally efficient and offer more promise in long-term prediction of chaotic time series.

Indexed as

Chaotic time seriesDeep learningEcho state networksNonlinear vector autoregressionRecurrent neural networksReservoir computing

Identifiers

PMID35755176
PMCPMC9230140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.