ArticleMachine learning with applications2022
Prediction of chaotic time series using recurrent neural networks and reservoir computing techniques: A comparative study.
Article in Machine learning with applications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Recent applications of chaos theory in medical sciences: progress and challenges.BMC biomedical engineering · 2026Article
- Deep Learning for analyzing chaotic dynamics in biological time series: Insights from frog heart signals.Neurocomputing · 2026Article
- Two Orders of Magnitude Reduction in Computational Load Achieved by Ultrawideband Responses of an Ion-Gating Reservoir.ACS nano · 2025Article
- Human brain integrates both unconditional and conditional timing statistics to guide expectation and behavior.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Connectomes inform function: from time-varying dynamics to animal behaviour.Natural computing · 2025Article
- TheBiomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Post-processing methods for delay embedding and feature scaling of reservoir computers.Communications engineering · 2025Article
- Principled neuromorphic reservoir computing.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Iono-Magnonic Reservoir Computing With Chaotic Spin Wave Interference Manipulated by Ion-Gating.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025Article
- A machine-learning approach for long-term prediction of experimental cardiac action potential time series using an autoencoder and echo state networks.Chaos (Woodbury, N.Y.) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, machine-learning techniques, particularly deep learning, have outperformed traditional time-series forecasting approaches in many contexts, including univariate and multivariate predictions. This study aims to investigate the capability of (i) gated recurrent neural networks, including long short-term memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) networks, (ii) reservoir computing (RC) techniques, such as echo state networks (ESNs) and hybrid physics-informed ESNs, and (iii) the nonlinear vector autoregression (NVAR) approach, which has recently been introduced as the next generation RC, for the prediction of chaotic time series and to compare their performance in terms of accuracy, efficiency, and robustness. We apply the methods to predict time series obtained from two widely used chaotic benchmarks, the Mackey-Glass and Lorenz-63 models, as well as two other chaotic datasets representing a bursting neuron and the dynamics of the El Niño Southern Oscillation, and to one experimental dataset representing a time series of cardiac voltage with complex dynamics. We find that even though gated RNN techniques have been successful in forecasting time series generally, they can fall short in predicting chaotic time series for the methods, datasets, and ranges of hyperparameter values considered here. In contrast, for the chaotic datasets studied, we found that reservoir computing and NVAR techniques are more computationally efficient and offer more promise in long-term prediction of chaotic time series.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.