Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755161›Full record

ArticleComputers & operations research2022

Covid-19 PPE distribution planning with demand priorities and supply uncertainties.

Gohram Baloch, Fatma Gzara, Samir Elhedhli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computers & operations research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gohram BalochSloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02169, United States of America.
Fatma GzaraDepartment of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.
Samir ElhedhliDepartment of Management Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, N2L 3G1, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent Covid-19 outbreak put healthcare resources under enormous pressure. Governments and healthcare authorities faced major challenges in securing and delivering critical supplies such as personal protective equipment (PPE) and test kits. As timely distribution of critical supplies exceeded government resources, certain sectors, negatively impacted by the pandemic, offered their storage and distribution capabilities; both helping with the crisis and creating economic revenue. We investigate the problem of optimally leveraging the capacity and efficiency of underutilized distribution networks to enhance the capability of government supply networks to meet healthcare needs for critical supplies. We model the problem as a dynamic distribution planning problem that decides on the re-purposing of storage facilities, the allocation of demand, and the timely distribution of limited PPE supplies to different jurisdictions. From a resource provider's perspective, the goal is to maximize demand fulfillment based on priorities set out by the government, as well as maximize economic value to participating networks. As uncertainty is a prevalent feature of the problem, we adopt a robust framework due to the lack of historical data on such supply uncertainties. We provide a mixed integer programming formulation for the adversarial problem and present a cutting plane algorithm to solve the robust model efficiently under both polyhedral and ellipsoidal uncertainty sets. We build a case study for the province of Ontario, Canada, and run extensive analysis of the service and economic value trade-off, and the effects of modeling demand priorities and supply uncertainties.

Indexed as

Demand fulfillmentDistributionPersonal protective equipmentRobust optimizationUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID35755161
PMCPMC9214648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.