ArticleIEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society2021
A Correlated Noise-assisted Decentralized Differentially Private Estimation Protocol, and its application to fMRI Source Separation.
Article in IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Approximating Functions with Approximate Privacy for Applications in Signal Estimation and Learning.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Enhancing collaborative neuroimaging research: introducing COINSTAC Vaults for federated analysis and reproducibility.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2023Article
- Federated Analysis of Neuroimaging Data: A Review of the Field.Neuroinformatics · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Blind source separation algorithms such as independent component analysis (ICA) are widely used in the analysis of neuroimaging data. To leverage larger sample sizes, different data holders/sites may wish to collaboratively learn feature representations. However, such datasets are often privacy-sensitive, precluding centralized analyses that pool the data at one site. In this work, we propose a differentially private algorithm for performing ICA in a decentralized data setting. Due to the high dimension and small sample size, conventional approaches to decentralized differentially private algorithms suffer in terms of utility. When centralizing the data is not possible, we investigate the benefit of enabling limited collaboration in the form of generating jointly distributed random noise. We show that such (anti) correlated noise improves the privacy-utility trade-off, and can reach the same level of utility as the corresponding non-private algorithm for certain parameter choices. We validate this benefit using synthetic and real neuroimaging datasets. We conclude that it is possible to achieve meaningful utility while preserving privacy, even in complex signal processing systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.