Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755147›Full record

ArticleIEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society2021

A Correlated Noise-assisted Decentralized Differentially Private Estimation Protocol, and its application to fMRI Source Separation.

Hafiz Imtiaz, Jafar Mohammadi, Rogers Silva, Bradley Baker, Sergey M Plis, Anand D Sarwate, Vince D Calhoun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in IEEE transactions on signal processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Hafiz ImtiazDepartment of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Jafar MohammadiNokia Bell Labs, Lorenzstrasse 10, 70435 Stuttgart, Germany.
Rogers SilvaTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, 55 Park Place NE, Atlanta, GA 30303.
Bradley BakerTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, 55 Park Place NE, Atlanta, GA 30303.
Sergey M PlisTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, 55 Park Place NE, Atlanta, GA 30303.
Anand D SarwateDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Rutgers University, 94 Brett Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854.
Vince D CalhounTri-institutional Center for Translational Research in Neuroimaging and Data Science (TReNDS), Georgia State University, Georgia Institute of Technology, and Emory University, 55 Park Place NE, Atlanta, GA 30303.

Funding

COINSTAC: Decentralized, Scalable Analysis of Loosely Coupled DataR01DA040487 · NIDA · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI CALHOUN, VINCE D, PLIS, SERGEY · 2015 to 2024
$7.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA040487
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blind source separation algorithms such as independent component analysis (ICA) are widely used in the analysis of neuroimaging data. To leverage larger sample sizes, different data holders/sites may wish to collaboratively learn feature representations. However, such datasets are often privacy-sensitive, precluding centralized analyses that pool the data at one site. In this work, we propose a differentially private algorithm for performing ICA in a decentralized data setting. Due to the high dimension and small sample size, conventional approaches to decentralized differentially private algorithms suffer in terms of utility. When centralizing the data is not possible, we investigate the benefit of enabling limited collaboration in the form of generating jointly distributed random noise. We show that such (anti) correlated noise improves the privacy-utility trade-off, and can reach the same level of utility as the corresponding non-private algorithm for certain parameter choices. We validate this benefit using synthetic and real neuroimaging datasets. We conclude that it is possible to achieve meaningful utility while preserving privacy, even in complex signal processing systems.

Indexed as

correlated noisedecentralized computationdifferential privacyfMRIindependent component analysis

Identifiers

PMID35755147
PMCPMC9232162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.