Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35755034›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2022

A Meta-Analysis on the Efficacy and Safety of Bacterial Lysates in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Yongkang Huang, Yongjian Pei, Yajuan Qian, Zhen Yao, Chen Chen, Juan Du, Minhua Shi, Tong Zhou

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Diverging patterns in innate immunity against respiratory viruses during a lifetime: lessons from the young and the old.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yongkang HuangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yongjian PeiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Yajuan QianDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Zhen YaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Chen ChenDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Juan DuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Minhua ShiDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Tong ZhouDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common and frequently encountered disease of respiratory apparatus and is vulnerable to infection. Increasing studies reveal that bacterial lysates play an encouraging role in preventing exacerbations in these patients. We here investigated the efficacy and safety of bacterial lysates in COPD. Methods: We performed systematic research on PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library (CENTRAL), and Web of Science by using the keywords and their synonyms for studies published before January 11, 2022. Two researchers screened the studies of literature independently according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria and extracted data from the included studies. Another two researchers assessed the risk of bias of each included using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analysis was conducted using R (version 4.1.1, The R Foundation for Statistical Computing) and Review Manager (version 5.4.0, The Cochrane Collaboration). Results: A total of 12 studies were included in this meta-analysis, and the pooled results showed that bacterial lysates were effective to reduce exacerbation rate (overall: relative risk [RR] = 0.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-0.96; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: RR = 0.87, 95% CI 0.77-0.98; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: RR = 0.70, 95% CI 0.41-1.20) and mean number of exacerbations (overall: MD = -0.42, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.08; alkaline bacterial lysate subgroup [OM-85]: MD = -0.72, 95% CI -1.35 to -0.09; mechanical bacterial lysate subgroup [Ismigen]: MD = -0.02, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.17). Bacterial lysates were also found beneficial in alleviating symptoms. The side effects were acceptable and slight. Conclusion: Bacterial lysates can benefit patients with COPD by reducing exacerbations and alleviating symptoms. OM-85 is the preferable product based on the existing evidence. Further studies are needed to validate these findings. Systematic Review Registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42022299420].

Indexed as

bacteria lysateschronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseefficacyIsmigenOM-85safety

Identifiers

PMID35755034
PMCPMC9218542

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.