ArticleRoyal Society open science2022
The spread of technological innovations: effects of psychology, culture and policy interventions.
Article in Royal Society open science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Large Language Model-Based Simplification of Digital Therapeutics Explanations for Insomnia and Nicotine Dependence: Two Randomized Online Experiments.JMIR human factors · 2026Trial
- Factors influencing college student intention to use ChatGPT with an integrated TAM and IDT model.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- The perception of facilitators and barriers to the use of e-health solutions in Poland: a qualitative study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Paradoxes in the coevolution of contagions and institutions.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Modelling social norms: an integration of the norm-utility approach with beliefs dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024Review
- Co-evolution of behaviour and beliefs in social dilemmas: estimating material, social, cognitive and cultural determinants.Evolutionary human sciences · 2024Article
- Article
- The technology acceptance model and adopter type analysis in the context of artificial intelligence.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
- Operationalizing cultural adaptation to climate change: contemporary examples from United States agriculture.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Assessing Health Students' Attitudes and Usage of ChatGPT in Jordan: Validation Study.JMIR medical education · 2023Article
- The spread of technological innovations: effects of psychology, culture and policy interventions.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Technological innovations drive the evolution of human societies. The success of innovations depends not only on their actual benefits but also on how potential adopters perceive them and how their beliefs are affected by their social and cultural environment. To deepen our understanding of socio-psychological processes affecting the new technology spread, we model the joint dynamics of three interlinked processes: individual learning and mastering the new technology, changes in individual attitudes towards it, and changes in individual adoption decisions. We assume that the new technology can potentially lead to a higher benefit but achieving it requires learning. We posit that individual decision-making process as well as their attitudes are affected by cognitive dissonance and conformity with peers and an external authority. Individuals vary in different psychological characteristics and in their attitudes. We investigate both transient dynamics and long-term equilibria observed in our model. We show that early adopters are usually individuals who are characterized by low cognitive dissonance and low conformity with peers but are sensitive to the effort of an external authority promoting the innovation. We examine the effectiveness of five different intervention strategies aiming to promote the diffusion of a new technology: training individuals, providing subsidies for early adopters, increasing the visibility of peer actions, simplifying the exchange of opinions between people, and increasing the effort of an external authority. We also discuss the effects of culture on the spread of innovations. Finally, we demonstrate that neglecting the cognitive forces and the dynamic nature of individual attitudes can lead to wrong conclusions about adoption of innovations. Our results can be useful in developing more efficient policies aiming to promote the spread of new technologies in different societies, cultures and countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.