Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35754955›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2022

PINK1/Parkin Pathway Activation for Mitochondrial Quality Control - Which Is the Best Molecular Target for Therapy?

Laura F Silvian

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Genetic mutations in kinases: a comprehensive review on marketed inhibitors and unexplored targets in Parkinson's disease.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Activation of parkin by a molecular glue.Nature communications · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laura F SilvianBiogen, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Biogen (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been long-term interest in drugging the PINK1-Parkin pathway with therapeutics as a treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD). Despite significant structural data on Parkin as well as the PINK1 kinase and the multiple conformational changes it undergoes, activation of these targets is non-trivial. This review highlights small molecule screening results that suggests that activation of Parkin biochemically does not necessarily translate to activation of Parkin within cells. There are also issues with activation of PINK1 with kinetin analogs, which do not appear to rescue rodent models of PD. The counter-measure of activating the mitophagy pathway with deubiquitinase (DUB) inhibitors such as USP30 inhibitors is progressing in the clinic for kidney disease and the proof of biology for this target will be tested in these trials. An alternative mechanism of activating Parkin in response to oxidative stress via Parkin phosphorylation by the AMPK-ULK1 pathway may be a simpler way to lower the energy barrier Parkin activation.

Indexed as

AMPKcryoEM (cryo-electron microscopy)crystallographymolecular mechanisms of activationParkinson’s diseasePINK1-Parkin pathwaysmall moleculeULK1 (unc-51 like autophagy activating kinase 1)

Identifiers

PMID35754955
PMCPMC9215347
OpenAlexW4285743867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.