Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35754859›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health and addiction2022

Problematic Shopping Behavior: An Item Response Theory Examination of the Seven-Item Bergen Shopping Addiction Scale.

Daniel Zarate, Lana Fullwood, Maria Prokofieva, Mark D Griffiths, Vasileios Stavropoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health and addiction, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Daniel ZarateInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, 70/104 Ballarat Road, Footscray, VIC 3011 Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1508-8637
Lana FullwoodVictoria University, Footscray, Australia.
Maria ProkofievaVictoria University, Footscray, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1974-3827
Mark D GriffithsInternational Gaming Research Unit, Psychology Department, Nottingham Trent University, Nottingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8880-6524
Vasileios StavropoulosInstitute for Health and Sport, Victoria University, 70/104 Ballarat Road, Footscray, VIC 3011 Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6964-4662

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an increasing amount of research examining problematic shopping behavior (PSB), often referred to in the psychological literature as "compulsive buying" or "shopping addiction." A popular scale for assessing the risk of PSB is the seven-item Bergen Shopping Addiction Scale (BSAS). To expand our knowledge of the psychometric properties of this instrument, the present study employed Item Response Theory (IRT) and differential item functioning analyses (DIF) while concurrently attempting to determine a preliminary cut-off point. A relatively large community sample completed the BSAS online (

Indexed as

Problematic shopping behavior; Shopping addiction; Bergen Shopping Addiction Scale; Item response theory; Differential item functioning

Identifiers

PMID35754859
PMCPMC9208247

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.