Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35754772›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in human neuroscience2022

Feasibility of Markerless Motion Capture for Three-Dimensional Gait Assessment in Community Settings.

Theresa E McGuirk, Elliott S Perry, Wandasun B Sihanath, Sherveen Riazati, Carolynn Patten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in human neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Walking as a Window to the Brain: Redefining Gait in Neurology.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Theresa E McGuirkBiomechanics, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Neuroscience Lab, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Elliott S PerryBiomechanics, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Neuroscience Lab, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Wandasun B SihanathBiomechanics, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Neuroscience Lab, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Sherveen RiazatiBiomechanics, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Neuroscience Lab, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
Carolynn PattenBiomechanics, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Neuroscience Lab, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA, United States.
University of California, Davis · USVA Northern California Health Care System · US

Funding

RRD VA IK6 RX003543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) kinematic analysis of gait holds potential as a digital biomarker to identify neuropathologies, monitor disease progression, and provide a high-resolution outcome measure to monitor neurorehabilitation efficacy by characterizing the mechanisms underlying gait impairments. There is a need for 3D motion capture technologies accessible to community, clinical, and rehabilitation settings. Image-based markerless motion capture (MLMC) using neural network-based deep learning algorithms shows promise as an accessible technology in these settings. In this study, we assessed the feasibility of implementing 3D MLMC technology outside the traditional laboratory environment to evaluate its potential as a tool for outcomes assessment in neurorehabilitation. A sample population of 166 individuals aged 9-87 years (mean 43.7, S.D. 20.4) of varied health history were evaluated at six different locations in the community over a 3-month period. Participants walked overground at self-selected (SS) and fastest comfortable (FC) speeds. Feasibility measures considered the expansion, implementation, and practicality of this MLMC system. A subset of the sample population (46 individuals) walked over a pressure-sensitive walkway (PSW) concurrently with MLMC to assess agreement of the spatiotemporal gait parameters measured between the two systems. Twelve spatiotemporal parameters were compared using mean differences, Bland-Altman analysis, and intraclass correlation coefficients for agreement (ICC

Indexed as

deep learningdigital biomarkersfeasibilitygait analysiskinematicsmarkerless motion captureneurorehabilitationspatiotemporal parameters

Identifiers

PMID35754772
PMCPMC9224754
OpenAlexW4285740019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.