ArticleiScience2022
Restoring faith in conservation action: Maintaining wild genetic diversity through the Tasmanian devil insurance program.
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Boost or Bust? The Impact of Supplementation on Functional Genetic Diversity and Selective Processes in Tasmanian Devils.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Temporal Changes in Tasmanian Devil Genetic Diversity at Sites With and Without Supplementation.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- Characterisation of the Historic Demographic Decline of the British European Polecat Population.Molecular ecology · 2025Article
- The devil in more detail: Eco-evolutionary genomics of Tasmanian devil persistence despite range-wide spread of a fatal, transmissible cancer.PLoS pathogens · 2025Article
- A Guide for Developing Demo-Genetic Models to Simulate Genetic Rescue.Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- No Evidence for Distinct Transcriptomic Subgroups of Devil Facial Tumor Disease (DFTD).Evolutionary applications · 2025Article
- Simulating Genetic Mixing in Strongly Structured Populations of the Threatened Southern Brown Bandicoot (Evolutionary applications · 2024Article
- Harnessing genomic technologies for one health solutions in the tropics.Globalization and health · 2024Review
- Heterogeneous patterns of heterozygosity loss in isolated populations of the threatened eastern barred bandicoot (Perameles gunnii).Molecular ecology · 2024Article
- Genomic insights into the critically endangered King Island scrubtit.The Journal of heredity · 2024Article
- Translating genomic advances into biodiversity conservation.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2024Review
- Complex associations between cancer progression and immune gene expression reveals early influence of transmissible cancer on Tasmanian devils.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Understanding the evolution of immune genes in jawed vertebrates.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2023Review
- The evolution of two transmissible cancers in Tasmanian devils.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conservation breeding programs aim to maintain 90% wild genetic diversity, but rarely assess functional diversity. Here, we compare both genome-wide and functional diversity (in over 500 genes) of Tasmanian devils (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.