Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35754692›Full record

ArticleEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM2022

Bibliometric Analysis of Network Pharmacology in Traditional Chinese Medicine.

Runpei Miao, Qinggang Meng, Chennan Wang, Wenjing Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Targeting AGE-RAGE Signaling Pathway with Hujin Decoction Ameliorates MAFLD in HepG2 Cells.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Potential bioactive compounds and mechanisms ofFrontiers in aging neuroscience · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Runpei MiaoSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5521-5947
Qinggang MengSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1400-2010
Chennan WangSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6164-8191
Wenjing YuanSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing 100029, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2257-1934

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: We evaluated the developmental process, research status, and existing challenges of network pharmacology. Moreover, we elucidated the corresponding solutions to improve and develop network pharmacology. Methods: Research data for the current study were retrieved from the Web of Science. The developmental process of network pharmacology was analyzed using HisCite, whereas cooccurrence analysis of countries, institutions, keywords, and references in literature was conducted using CiteSpace. Results: In literature, there was a trend of annual increase of studies on network pharmacology and China was found to be the country with the most published literature on network pharmacology. The main publishing research institutions were universities of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). The keywords with more research frequency were TCM, mechanisms, molecular docking, and quercetin, among others. Conclusion: Currently, studies on network pharmacology are mainly associated with the exploration of action mechanisms of TCM. The main active ingredient in many Chinese medicines is quercetin. This ingredient may lead to deviation of research results, inability to truly analyze active ingredients, and even mislead the research direction of TCM. Such deviation may be because the database fails to reflect the content and composition changes of Chinese medicinal components. The database does not account for interactions among components, targets, and diseases, and it ignores the different pathological states of the disease. Therefore, network pharmacology should be improved from the databases and research methods.

Identifiers

PMID35754692
PMCPMC9217600

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.