Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35754530›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Development of an Indirect ELISA for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Antibodies in Cats.

Dashzeveg Bold, Gleyder Roman-Sosa, Natasha N Gaudreault, Batsukh Zayat, Roman M Pogranichniy, Juergen A Richt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Dashzeveg BoldDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Gleyder Roman-SosaDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Natasha N GaudreaultDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Batsukh ZayatInstitute of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Sciences, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia.
Roman M PogranichniyVeterinary Diagnostic Laboratory, Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Juergen A RichtDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS, United States.
Kansas State University · USMongolian University of Life Sciences · MN

Funding

Sex-specific effects of obestity on Influenza A virus infection and immunityP20GM130448 · NIGMS · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Juergen A Richt · 2020 to 2026
$15.8M
Developing and validating serological assays to SARS-COV-2 for highly susceptible animal speciesU18FD007509 · FDA · KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY · PI POGRANICHNIY, ROMAN · 2021 to 2022
$450k
FDA HHS U18 FD007509NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Companion animals are susceptible to a variety of coronaviruses, and recent studies show that felines are highly susceptible to SARS-CoV-2 infection. RT-PCR diagnostic is currently the method of choice to detect the presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific viral nucleic acids in animal samples during an active infection; however, serological assays are critical to determine whether animals were exposed to the virus and to determine the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in a defined population. In this study, we utilized recombinant nucleocapsid (N) protein and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 expressed in E. coli (N) and mammalian cells (N, RBD) to develop indirect ELISA (iELISA) tests using well-characterized SARS-CoV-2-positive and -negative cat serum panels from previous experimental cat challenge studies. The optimal conditions for the iELISA tests were established based on checkerboard dilutions of antigens and antibodies. The diagnostic sensitivity for the detection of feline antibodies specific for the N or RBD proteins of the iELISA tests was between 93.3 and 97.8%, respectively, and the diagnostic specificity 95.5%. The iELISAs developed here can be used for high-throughput screening of cat sera for both antigens. The presence of SARS-CoV-2-specific antibodies in a BSL-2 biocontainment environment, unlike virus neutralization tests with live virus which have to be performed in BSL-3 laboratories.

Indexed as

antibodiescatCOVID-19diagnosticELISAfelineSARS-CoV-2serology

Identifiers

PMID35754530
PMCPMC9226769
OpenAlexW4281667430

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.