Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35754461›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in digital health2022

Digital Solutions for Community and Primary Health Workers: Lessons From Implementations in Africa.

Ayomide Owoyemi, Joanne I Osuchukwu, Clark Azubuike, Ronald Kelechi Ikpe, Blessing C Nwachukwu, Cassandra B Akinde, Grace W Biokoro, Abisoye B Ajose, Ezechukwu Ikenna Nwokoma, Nehemiah E Mfon and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in digital health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 9 institutions in 3 countries.

Ayomide OwoyemiDepartment of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, Chicago, IL, United States.
Joanne I OsuchukwuMende Primary Health Center, Kosofe Local Government, Lagos, Nigeria.
Clark AzubuikeSocial and Behavioral Sciences Department, T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Harvard University, Boston, MA, United States.
Ronald Kelechi IkpeDepartment of Health Informatics, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.
Blessing C NwachukwuDepartment of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, Chicago, IL, United States.
Cassandra B AkindeThe Neo Child Initiative for Africa, Lagos, Nigeria.
Grace W BiokoroDepartment of Human and Health Sciences, Northern Illinois University, DeKalb, IL, United States.
Abisoye B AjoseDepartment of Community Health and Primary Care, College of Medicine, University of Lagos, Lagos, Nigeria.
Ezechukwu Ikenna NwokomaSociety for Family Health Nigeria, Abuja, Nigeria.
Nehemiah E MfonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Hospital, Abuja, Nigeria.
Temitope O BensonInstitute for Computational and Data Sciences, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Albany, NY, United States.
Anthony EhimareDepartment of Health Informatics, Swansea University, Wales, United Kingdom.
Daniel Irowa-OmoregieCareMonie Health Financing, Abuja, Nigeria.
Seun OlaniranDepartment of Integrated Information Technology, College of Engineering and Computing, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, United States.
Swansea University · GBHarvard University · USLagos State Health Service Commission · NGNational Hospital Abuja · NGNorthern Illinois University · USSociety for Family Health Nigeria · NGUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · USUniversity of Lagos · NGUniversity of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The agenda for Universal Health Coverage has driven the exploration of various innovative approaches to expanding health services to the general population. As more African countries have adopted digital health tools as part of the strategic approach to expanding health services, there is a need for defining a standard framework for implementation across board. Therefore, there is a need to review and employ an evidence-based approach to inform managing challenges, adopting best approaches, and implement informed recommendations. We reviewed a variety of digital health tools applied to different health conditions in primary care settings and highlighted the challenges faced, approaches that worked and relevant recommendations. These include limited coverage and network connectivity, lack of technological competence, lack of power supply, limited mobile phone usage and application design challenges. Despite these challenges, this review suggests that mHealth solutions could attain effective usage when healthcare workers receive adequate onsite training, deploying applications designed in an intuitive and easy to understand approach in a manner that fits into the users existing workflows, and involvement of the stakeholders at all levels in the design, planning, and implementation stages of the interventions.

Indexed as

Africacommunity healthdigital healtheHealthmHealthprimary health

Identifiers

PMID35754461
PMCPMC9215204
OpenAlexW4281677829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.