ArticleComprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology2021
Socioeconomic status in patients with Turner syndrome.
Article in Comprehensive psychoneuroendocrinology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Employment and work ability in individuals living with rare diseases: a systematic literature review.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025Pooled it
- Clinical practice guidelines for the care of girls and women with Turner syndrome.European journal of endocrinology · 2024Guideline
- Stigma in differences of sex development: a scoping review.Journal of pediatric psychology · 2025Article
- Transition from pediatric to adult care in patients with Turner syndrome in Italy: a consensus statement by the TRAMITI project.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2024Article
- Reduced effects of social feedback on learning in Turner syndrome.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Turner syndrome (TS) is a genetic condition with a broad phenotypic spectrum. In contrast to the medical conditions, socioeconomic factors are not well understood. Our goal was to evaluate the socioeconomic status (SES) among women with TS in a European-wide cohort, and to look for possible associated factors. Methods: This study was part of the multicenter dsd-LIFE study, including 328 women with TS. We evaluated SES (education, occupation and income) using patient-reported outcomes. Furthermore, information was collected on karyotype, age at diagnosis, comorbidity, marital status, social integration and discrimination. Reference data on SES were retrieved from the European Social Survey. Linear and logistic regression analyses were performed to compare SES of the study population with the reference population, and to analyze possible associated factors. Results: Women with TS showed a high level of education, employment status and satisfaction with income. In contrast, fewer women were living together and fewer social activities were reported compared with the reference population. The latter factors were more strongly associated with SES than medical factors. The unemployment rate was the highest in TS women aged 26-30 years, while a low education was associated with a later age at diagnosis. No major differences in SES were found among the different karyotype groups. Conclusions: The SES in women with TS was generally comparable with the reference population, although they were less frequently living with a partner or having social activities. More attention is needed for (early) psychosocial screening and support, and strategies for earlier diagnosis of TS are necessary.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.