Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35754298›Full record

Trial reportCancer science2022

Pertuzumab retreatment for HER2-positive advanced breast cancer: A randomized, open-label phase III study (PRECIOUS).

Yutaka Yamamoto, Hiroji Iwata, Naruto Taira, Norikazu Masuda, Masato Takahashi, Tetsuhiro Yoshinami, Takayuki Ueno, Tatsuya Toyama, Takashi Yamanaka, Toshimi Takano and 12 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Therapeutic Antibodies in Medicine.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 18 institutions in 2 countries.

Yutaka YamamotoDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6147-6828
Hiroji IwataDepartment of Breast Oncology, Aichi Cancer Center Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Naruto TairaDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Okayama University Hospital, Okayama, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4266-1117
Norikazu MasudaDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7302-0278
Masato TakahashiDepartment of Breast Surgery, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Cancer Center, Sapporo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6641-9598
Tetsuhiro YoshinamiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan.
Takayuki UenoBreast Surgical Oncology, Breast Oncology Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the JFCR, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9080-9377
Tatsuya ToyamaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4713-7795
Takashi YamanakaDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Kanagawa Cancer Center, Yokohama, Japan.
Toshimi TakanoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiro KashiwabaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Social Medical Corporation Hakuaikai, Sagara Hospital, Kagoshima, Japan.
Koichiro TsugawaDepartment of Surgery, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kawasaki, Japan.
Yoshie HasegawaDepartment of Breast Surgery, Hirosaki Municipal Hospital, Aomori, Japan.
Kenji TamuraDepartment of Breast and Medical Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3514-9927
Hiroshi TadaDepartment of Breast and Endocrine Surgical Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Fumikata HaraBreast Medical Oncology, Breast Oncology Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Tokyo, Japan.
Tomomi FujisawaDepartment of Breast Oncology, Gunma Prefectural Cancer Center, Ota, Japan.
Naoki NiikuraDepartment of Breast Oncology, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Japan.
Shigehira SajiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Fukushima Medical University School of Medicine, Fukushima, Japan.
Satoshi MoritaDepartment of Biomedical Statistics and Bioinformatics, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
Masakazu ToiDepartment of Breast Surgery, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1488-9958
Shinji OhnoBreast Oncology Center, The Cancer Institute Hospital of the JFCR, Tokyo, Japan.
The Cancer Institute Hospital · JPKyoto University · JPAichi Cancer Center · JPFukushima Medical University · JPGunma Prefectural Cardiovascular Center · JPHirosaki Central Hospital · JPKanagawa Prefectural Hospital Organization · JPKumamoto University Hospital · JPNagoya City University · JPNational Cancer Center Hospital East · JPNational Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center · JPNational Sagamihara Hospital · JPOkayama University Hospital · JPOsaka City University · JPOsaka National Hospital · JPSt. Marianna University School of Medicine · JPTohoku University · JPTokai University Hospital · JP

Funding

Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

No standard options existed for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive advanced breast cancer that progresses after second-line trastuzumab emtansine therapy before 2020. The purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of pertuzumab retreatment after disease progression following pertuzumab-containing therapy for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer for the first time. This randomized, open-label, multicenter phase III trial was undertaken in 93 sites in Japan. Eligible patients with HER2-positive breast cancer who had received pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and chemotherapy as first- and/or second-line therapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to: (i) pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and physician's choice chemotherapy (PTC), or (ii) trastuzumab and physician's choice chemotherapy (TC). The primary end-point was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Between August 1, 2015 and December 31, 2018, 219 patients were randomized to PTC (n = 110) or TC (n = 109). Median follow-up was 14.2 months (interquartile range, 9.0-22.2), and median PFS was 5.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.0-6.6) with PTC and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.2-4.8) with TC (stratified hazard ratio 0.76 [95% CI upper limit 0.967]; p = 0.022). Progression-free survival was improved by adding pertuzumab in all prespecified subgroups. The PTC arm showed a trend towards better overall survival and duration of response, but similar objective response and health-related quality of life. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was similar between groups except for diarrhea. Pertuzumab retreatment contributes to disease control for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with pertuzumab-containing regimens.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansQuality of LifeRetreatmentTrastuzumabAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasespertuzumabTrastuzumabadvanced breast cancerheavily pretreatedHER2-positivepertuzumabtrastuzumab

Identifiers

PMID35754298
PMCPMC9459345
OpenAlexW4283588637

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.