Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35754206›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of cancer care2022

The impact of radical prostatectomy on the social well-being of prostate cancer survivors: A qualitative meta-synthesis.

Omar Eymech, Oliver Brunckhorst, Matthew Deacon, Callum James, Jessica Bowie, Prokar Dasgupta, Kamran Ahmed

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of cancer care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Relationship Values and Committed Actions Among Couples Coping with Prostate Cancer: A Qualitative Study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Omar EymechMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2691-0072
Oliver BrunckhorstMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2073-922X
Matthew DeaconDepartment of Urology, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Callum JamesMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6052-1559
Jessica BowieMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4216-5316
Prokar DasguptaMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8690-0445
Kamran AhmedMRC Centre for Transplantation, Guy's Hospital Campus, King's College London, King's Health Partners, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5135-9211
Guy's Hospital · GBKing's College Hospital · GB

Funding

GSTT CharityKCL-Vattikuti Institute of Robotic SurgeryKing's Medical Research Trust (KMRT)Malcolm Coptcoat TrustMRC Centre for TransplantationRoyal College of Surgeons of EnglandThe Malcolm Coptcoat TrustThe Pelican FoundationThe Urology Foundation
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe impact of radical prostatectomy on the social well-being of survivors remains poorly understood. This meta-synthesis therefore aimed to integrate the findings of qualitative research evaluating the impact of surgery on the patient relationships with partners, family and wider societal interactions.

methodsMedline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Embase were searched for qualitative studies evaluating social well-being dimensions. A thematic meta-synthesis was conducted to inductively construct descriptive themes and overarching analytical themes.

resultsThirty-one articles were included, with seven descriptive themes under two analytical themes generated to describe the experiences of 469 participants. 'Pathway to Conversion' encompassed three themes on the evolving social behaviour of men with both partners and family to adapt to their new normality postoperatively. 'A Man on My Own' discussed four themes focussing on both intimate and wider social relations, describing the stigma, shame and embarrassment felt by patients due to changes in their perceived body image and physical function. This resulted in men feeling alone, unsupported and seeking isolation.

conclusionRadical prostatectomy's impact on survivors' social well-being extends beyond surgery and causes a shift in their relationship dynamics with partner and family, highlighting the importance of preoperative and postoperative clinician's counselling to both patient and partner.

Indexed as

Cancer SurvivorsProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMaleProstateProstatectomyQualitative ResearchSexual PartnersSurvivorsprostate cancerprostatectomyquality of lifesexual partnerssurgerysurvivorship

Identifiers

PMID35754206
PMCPMC11497296
OpenAlexW4283582417

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.