Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35754046›Full record

SynthesisBMC psychology2022

A systematic review of interventions aiming to improve newly-qualified doctors' wellbeing in the United Kingdom.

Aditya Krishnan, Opeyemi Odejimi, Ian Bertram, Priyamvada Sneha Chukowry, George Tadros

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Prevalence and determinants of burnout among South African doctors during the COVID-19 pandemic.The South African journal of psychiatry : SAJP : the journal of the Society of Psychiatrists of South Africa · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Mentorship in Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery: A Scoping Review.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Aditya KrishnanBirmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK. adityakrishnan@doctors.org.uk.
Opeyemi OdejimiPsychiatric Liaison Team, Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Ian BertramRoyal Army Medical Corps, Birmingham, UK.
Priyamvada Sneha ChukowryBirmingham Heartlands Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
George TadrosAston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, UK.
University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust · GBAston University · GBMental Health Foundation · GBRoyal Navy · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNewly-qualified doctors in the United Kingdom experience a great deal of stress and have poor wellbeing when compared to more senior counterparts. A number of interventions have been put in place to boost healthcare professionals' wellbeing, but little is known about interventions aimed to improve the wellbeing of newly-qualified doctors in the United Kingdom. This study aims to systematically review current evidence of interventions which improved the wellbeing of newly-qualified junior doctors in the United Kingdom.

methodsFive key electronic databases were searched. Subsequently, reference scanning and citation search was performed. Studies were included if they were conducted from the commencement of the Foundation Programme in 2004, until 2019. In addition, studies had to be performed on junior doctors: working in the United Kingdom and within their first five years post-qualification and have a quantitative outcome. Studies which did not meet these criteria were excluded. Quality was assessed using the modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Bias was not formally assessed using a standardised tool.

resultsSeven papers met the inclusion criteria and identified three main types of interventions: mentorship, mindfulness and clinical preparation interventions. The majority of included studies reported a positive result from the performed intervention, suggesting these to be beneficial in improving junior doctor wellbeing, and thereby reducing anxiety and stress levels. However, most of the studies used small sample sizes.

conclusionsThis review reveals that there is dearth of evidence on the effectiveness of intervention to improve the wellbeing of newly-qualified doctors in the United Kingdom. Most of the identified interventions focused on relieving stress and anxiety inherent within newly-qualified doctors' training programmes. However, wellbeing interventions need to take into cognisance all the factors which impact on wellbeing, particularly job-related factors. We recommend that future researchers implement large-scale holistic interventions using appropriate research methods. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019127341.

Indexed as

MindfulnessPhysiciansHealth PersonnelHumansUnited KingdomBurnoutInterventionJunior doctorNewly-qualified doctorPhysicianStressSystematic reviewUnited KingdomWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID35754046
PMCPMC9235154
OpenAlexW4283520552

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.