Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35753697›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2022

BioAutoML: automated feature engineering and metalearning to predict noncoding RNAs in bacteria.

Robson P Bonidia, Anderson P Avila Santos, Breno L S de Almeida, Peter F Stadler, Ulisses N da Rocha, Danilo S Sanches, André C P L F de Carvalho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Robson P BonidiaInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil.
Anderson P Avila SantosInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil.
Breno L S de AlmeidaInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil.
Peter F StadlerDepartment of Computer Science and Interdisciplinary Center of Bioinformatics, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Ulisses N da RochaDepartment of Environmental Microbiology, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research-UFZ GmbH, Leipzig, Saxony, Germany.
Danilo S SanchesDepartment of Computer Science, Federal University of Technology - Paraná, UTFPR, Cornélio Procópio 86300-000, Brazil.
André C P L F de CarvalhoInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Sciences, University of São Paulo, São Carlos 13566-590, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent technological advances have led to an exponential expansion of biological sequence data and extraction of meaningful information through Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. This knowledge has improved the understanding of mechanisms related to several fatal diseases, e.g. Cancer and coronavirus disease 2019, helping to develop innovative solutions, such as CRISPR-based gene editing, coronavirus vaccine and precision medicine. These advances benefit our society and economy, directly impacting people's lives in various areas, such as health care, drug discovery, forensic analysis and food processing. Nevertheless, ML-based approaches to biological data require representative, quantitative and informative features. Many ML algorithms can handle only numerical data, and therefore sequences need to be translated into a numerical feature vector. This process, known as feature extraction, is a fundamental step for developing high-quality ML-based models in bioinformatics, by allowing the feature engineering stage, with design and selection of suitable features. Feature engineering, ML algorithm selection and hyperparameter tuning are often manual and time-consuming processes, requiring extensive domain knowledge. To deal with this problem, we present a new package: BioAutoML. BioAutoML automatically runs an end-to-end ML pipeline, extracting numerical and informative features from biological sequence databases, using the MathFeature package, and automating the feature selection, ML algorithm(s) recommendation and tuning of the selected algorithm(s) hyperparameters, using Automated ML (AutoML). BioAutoML has two components, divided into four modules: (1) automated feature engineering (feature extraction and selection modules) and (2) Metalearning (algorithm recommendation and hyper-parameter tuning modules). We experimentally evaluate BioAutoML in two different scenarios: (i) prediction of the three main classes of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) and (ii) prediction of the eight categories of ncRNAs in bacteria, including housekeeping and regulatory types. To assess BioAutoML predictive performance, it is experimentally compared with two other AutoML tools (RECIPE and TPOT). According to the experimental results, BioAutoML can accelerate new studies, reducing the cost of feature engineering processing and either keeping or improving predictive performance. BioAutoML is freely available at https://github.com/Bonidia/BioAutoML.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAlgorithmsBacteriaHumansMachine LearningCOVID-19 Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID35753697
PMCPMC9294424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.