Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35753230›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology2022

Fundal pressure to shorten the second stage of labor: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tomi Kanninen, Federica Bellussi, Vincenzo Berghella

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. A comparison in maternal and neonatal outcomes between mild fundal pressure and vacuum extraction for shortening the second stage of labor.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tomi KanninenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Richmond University Medical Center, New York, NY, USA.
Federica BellussiDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Vincenzo BerghellaDivision of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. Electronic address: vincenzo.berghella@jefferson.edu.
Thomas Jefferson University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSystematically review the evidence on fundal pressure to expedite vaginal delivery. STUDY

designLiterature search in electronic databases. Randomized controlled trials of fundal pressure to expedite delivery were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the length of the second stage.

resultsWe identified 10 randomized controlled trials. Fundal pressure was associated with a shorter length of the second stage of labor (mean difference (MD) -20.33 min, 95% confidence intervals (CI) -28.55, -12.11). Sub-group analysis with only manual pressure or a belt confirmed the association. There was no significant difference in the rate of vaginal delivery (relative risk (RR) 1.00, 95%, CI 0.98, 1.02), one and five minute Apgar scores (MD 0.10, 95%, confidence intervals -0.05, 0.24; and MD 0.02, 95%, CI -0.12, 0.15), neonatal trauma (RR 0.33, 95%, CI 0.01, 7.90), vaginal/perineal laceration (RR 0.83, 95%, CI 0.57, 1.22), cervical laceration (RR 1.30, 95%, CI 0.21, 8.02), episiotomy (RR 1.08, 95%, CI 0.96, 1.21), cesarean section rate (RR 0.72; 95%, CI 0.34, 1.51), operative vaginal deliveries (RR 0.79; 95%, CI 0.55, 1.13) and neonatal intensive care admissions (RR 0.33, 95%, CI 0.01, 7.90). However, patients receiving fundal pressure had a lower umbilical cord arterial pH (MD -0.03, 95%, CI -0.04, -0.01), and a 3.5 non-significantly higher incidence of Apgar scores < 7 at 5 min (4.9% vs 0.7%, RR 3.48, 95%, CI 0.57, 21.32).

conclusionsFundal pressure in the second stage is associated with a 20-minute decrease in the length of labor and a small decrease in neonatal umbilical artery pH.

Indexed as

Labor Stage, SecondLacerationsCesarean SectionDelivery, ObstetricFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornPerineumPregnancyFundal pressureKristeller maneuverSecond stage of labor

Identifiers

PMID35753230
OpenAlexW4282570164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.