ReviewNeurourology and urodynamics2022
Mathematical modeling of the lower urinary tract: A review.
Review in Neurourology and urodynamics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Seventy-Five Years of NIH NIDDK Funding Has Increased Knowledge and Greatly Impacted Clinical Care.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2026Review
- An open-source neurodynamic model of the lower urinary tract.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Biomimetic, Suturable, and Extensible Electrospun Scaffolds for Lower Urinary Tract Surgical Reconstruction.Advanced healthcare materials · 2025Article
- Onset of Spontaneous Filling and Voiding Cycles in the Lower Urinary Tract: A Modeling Study.Bulletin of mathematical biology · 2024Article
- Is the time right for a new initiative in mathematical modeling of the lower urinary tract? ICI-RS 2023.Neurourology and urodynamics · 2024Review
- Intracellular remodeling associated with endoplasmic reticulum stress modifies biomechanical compliance of bladder cells.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsUnderstand what progress has been made toward a functionally predictive lower urinary tract (LUT) model, identify knowledge gaps, and develop from them a path forward.
methodsWe surveyed prominent mathematical models of the basic LUT components (bladder, urethra, and their neural control) and categorized the common modeling strategies and theoretical assumptions associated with each component. Given that LUT function emerges from the interaction of these components, we emphasized attempts to model their connections, and highlighted unmodeled aspects of LUT function.
resultsThere is currently no satisfactory model of the LUT in its entirety that can predict its function in response to disease, treatment, or other perturbations. In particular, there is a lack of physiologically based mathematical descriptions of the neural control of the LUT.
conclusionsBased on our survey of the work to date, a potential path to a predictive LUT model is a modular effort in which models are initially built of individual tissue-level components using methods that are extensible and interoperable, allowing them to be connected and tested in a common framework. A modular approach will allow the larger goal of a comprehensive LUT model to be in sight while keeping individual efforts manageable, ensure new models can straightforwardly build on prior research, respect potential interactions between components, and incentivize efforts to model absent components. Using a modular framework and developing models based on physiological principles, to create a functionally predictive model is a challenge that the field is ready to undertake.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.