Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35753019›Full record

ArticleClinical and experimental immunology2022

Risk stratification through allergy history: single-centre experience of specialized COVID-19 vaccine clinic.

Daniel Lyons, Cliodhna Murray, Siobhan Hannigan, Jacklyn Sui, Salma Alamin, Niall Conlon, Mary Keogan, Khairin Khalib, Chris Fitzpatrick, Jonathan O'B Hourihane and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel LyonsDepartment of Clinical Immunology, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-2719-797X
Cliodhna MurrayDepartment of Clinical Immunology, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Siobhan HanniganCitywest Vaccination Centre, Dublin, Ireland.
Jacklyn SuiDepartment of Clinical Immunology, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Salma AlaminDepartment of Clinical Immunology, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Niall ConlonDepartment of Clinical Immunology, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
Mary KeoganDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Khairin KhalibDepartment of Clinical Immunology, Beaumont Hospital, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Chris FitzpatrickClinical Lead for Covid-19 Vaccinations, Dublin Midland Hospitals Group, Citywest Vaccination Centre, Dublin, Ireland.
Jonathan O'B HourihaneRoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Michael CareyCitywest Vaccination Centre, Dublin, Ireland.
J David M EdgarDepartment of Clinical Immunology, St James' Hospital, Dublin 8, Ireland.
St. James's Hospital · IEBeaumont Hospital · IERoyal College of Surgeons in Ireland · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaphylaxis is a rare side-effect of COVID-19 vaccines. To (a) provide direct advice and reassurance to certain persons with a history of anaphylaxis/complex allergy, in addition to that available in national guidelines, and (b) to provide a medically supervised vaccination, a specialist regional vaccine allergy clinic was established. The main objective was to determine if risk stratification through history can lead to safe COVID-19 vaccination for maximum population coverage. A focused history was taken to establish contraindications to giving COVID-19 vaccines. People who reported a high-risk allergy history were given a vaccine not containing the excipient thought to have directly caused previous anaphylaxis. All vaccines were monitored for 30 min after administration. A total of 206 people were vaccinated between 6 July 2021 and 31 August 2021; Comirnaty (Pfizer-BioNTech) (n = 34), and Janssen (n = 172). In total, 78% were women. Ninety-two people (45%) reported a high-risk allergy history. There were no cases of anaphylaxis. Three people developed urticaria and one of these also developed transient tachycardia. One vaccinee developed a pseudoseizure. Two of 208 people (<1%) referred during this time declined vaccination based on personal preference, despite the assessment of low clinical risk. In our experience, all vaccines with high-risk allergy histories were administered Pfizer BioNTech or Janssen Covid-19 vaccines uneventfully following screening based on allergy-focussed history. Our data support that drug allergy is not associated with a higher risk of vaccine-related anaphylaxis but may act to guide the administration of alternate vaccines to people with polyethylene glycol/polysorbate 80/trometamol allergies or anaphylaxis after the first dose.

Indexed as

AnaphylaxisCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesFemaleHumansMaleRisk AssessmentCOVID-19 VaccinesVaccinesallergyCOVID-19public healthvaccination

Identifiers

PMID35753019
PMCPMC9278227
OpenAlexW4283574923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.