ArticleActa neurologica Belgica2022
A novel prognostic system based on clinical and laboratory parameters for childhood Guillain-Barre syndrome.
Article in Acta neurologica Belgica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Role of Serum Albumin as a Prognostic Marker in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: A Systematic Review.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Review
- Diagnostic Pitfalls in Guillain-Barré Syndrome: Case Report and Literature Review.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo develop a score based on clinical and laboratory parameters in acute-phase of GBS to predict outcome at 6 months.
methodsClinical and laboratory assessment at admission including blood neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), pre and post-immunotherapy serum albumin was prospectively performed in pediatric-GBS cases at a tertiary-care hospital over 1 year. Clinical features and laboratory test results were compared between children with complete (Hughes Disability Score; HDS ≤ 1) and incomplete recovery (HDS > 1) at 6 months from onset, using univariate and multivariate analysis. Area-under-receiver-operating-characteristic-curve (AUC) of predictors of prognosis and their optimal cutoffs were assessed.
resultsForty-six patients were enrolled (mean age 69.1 ± 35.2 months; male 57.6%). Factors on admission that independently predicted poor-outcome at 6 months were older age, feeble voice, lower NLR and lower post-immunotherapy serum albumin. AUCs and optimal cutoffs of NLR and post-immunotherapy serum albumin for predicting disability at 6 months were 0.729, 0.781 and ≤ 1.65, ≤ 34.5 g/L, respectively. AUCs of clinical parameters such as older age and feeble voice were 0.749 and 0.713 respectively. King GBS outcomescore including all predictors had maximum AUC of 0.971 (95% CI 0.921-1.02). The score at cutoff ≥ 3 demonstrated excellent sensitivity (92.3%) and specificity (96.7%) to determine poor outcome.
conclusionsThis new prognostic system may be beneficial in recognising children-at-risk of poor prognosis who may benefit from additional treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.