Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35752803›Full record

ArticleBMC women's health2022

Partner support and women's contraceptive use: insight from urban poor communities in Accra, Ghana.

Martin Wiredu Agyekum, Elizabeth G Henry, Mawuli Komla Kushitor, Akua Danquah Obeng-Dwamena, Caesar Agula, Patrick Opoku Asuming, Theophilus Toprah, Charles Agyei-Asabere, Iqbal Shah, Ayaga A Bawah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Martin Wiredu AgyekumUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana. mwagyekum@uew.edu.gh.
Elizabeth G HenryHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
Mawuli Komla KushitorUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana.
Akua Danquah Obeng-DwamenaUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Caesar AgulaUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Patrick Opoku AsumingUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Theophilus ToprahUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Charles Agyei-AsabereUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
Iqbal ShahHarvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston Massachusetts, USA.
Ayaga A BawahUniversity of Ghana, Accra, Ghana.
University of Ghana · GHHarvard University · USUniversity of Health and Allied Sciences · GH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the benefits associated with contraceptive use, there is a low prevalence of contraceptive use in sub-Saharan Africa and Ghana. Previous studies have partly and consistently attributed the low prevalence of contraceptive use to partner opposition. However, little is known about the influence of men in contraceptive related choices of their partners, particularly within the context of urban poverty. This study examines the influences of partners on women's contraceptive choices.

methodsThe study utilized a cross-sectional household survey data of 1578 currently married women and women in a union of reproductive ages 16-44 years. Women who were pregnant and those trying to be pregnant were excluded from the analysis. The dependent variables for the study were current use of any contraceptive method, types of contraceptive methods and types of modern contraceptive methods. The independent variable for the study was a woman's report of partner support in contraceptive related choices. A binary logistic regression model was used to examine the associations between partner support in contraceptive related choices and contraceptive use of women.

resultsThe results of the study show that partner support of contraceptive related choices has a significant influence on contraceptive use of women. Women who indicated support from their partners were more likely to be current users of any contraceptive method, yet were less likely to use modern contraceptive methods.

conclusionThe study highlights the need to involve men in family planning programs and research, as well as educating them on the various contraceptive modern methods and the side effects.

Indexed as

ContraceptionContraceptive AgentsAdolescentAdultContraception BehaviorCross-Sectional StudiesFamily Planning ServicesFemaleGhanaHumansMaleSocial SupportYoung AdultContraceptive AgentsContraceptive useModern methodsPartnerTraditional methods

Identifiers

PMID35752803
PMCPMC9233795
OpenAlexW4283458483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.