Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35752794›Full record

ReviewFungal biology and biotechnology2022

Exploring fungal RiPPs from the perspective of chemical ecology.

R E Ford, G D Foster, A M Bailey

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Fungal biology and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Comparative Whole-Genome Sequence Analysis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  2. The "dark magic mushroom" co-produces amatoxins and psilocybin.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Leaderless RiPPs expand the repertoire of fungal secondary metabolites.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  5. RadicalJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Frontiers in fungal biology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R E FordSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 28 Tyndall Ave, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.
G D FosterSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 28 Tyndall Ave, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.
A M BaileySchool of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building, 28 Tyndall Ave, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK. Andy.Bailey@bristol.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council S127381-184
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Since the initial detection, in 2007, of fungal ribosomally synthesised and post-translationally modified peptides (RiPPs), this group of natural products has undergone rapid expansion, with four separate classes now recognised: amatoxins/phallotoxins, borosins, dikaritins, and epichloëcyclins. Largely due to their historically anthropocentric employment in medicine and agriculture, novel fungal proteins and peptides are seldom investigated in relation to the fungus itself. Therefore, although the benefits these compounds confer to humans are often realised, their evolutionary advantage to the fungus, the reason for their continued production, is often obscure or ignored. This review sets out to summarise current knowledge on how these small peptide-derived products influence their producing species and surrounding biotic environment.

Indexed as

Chemical ecologyMycotoxinRiPPSecondary metabolites

Identifiers

PMID35752794
PMCPMC9233826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.