Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35752763›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2022

Residents' perspectives of mobile X-ray services in support of healthcare-in-place in residential aged care facilities: a qualitative study.

Joanne Dollard, Jane Edwards, Lalit Yadav, Virginie Gaget, David Tivey, Maria Inacio, Guy Maddern, Renuka Visvanathan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Joanne DollardAdelaide Geriatrics Training and Research With Aged Care (GTRAC) Centre, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, 37a Woodville Rd, Woodville South, South Australia, 5011, Australia. joanne.dollard@adelaide.edu.au.
Jane EdwardsAdelaide Geriatrics Training and Research With Aged Care (GTRAC) Centre, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, 37a Woodville Rd, Woodville South, South Australia, 5011, Australia.
Lalit YadavAdelaide Geriatrics Training and Research With Aged Care (GTRAC) Centre, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, 37a Woodville Rd, Woodville South, South Australia, 5011, Australia.
Virginie GagetSurgical Specialties, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
David TiveySurgical Specialties, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
Maria InacioRegistry of Senior Australians, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Guy MaddernSurgical Specialties, University of Adelaide, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woodville, South Australia, Australia.
Renuka VisvanathanAdelaide Geriatrics Training and Research With Aged Care (GTRAC) Centre, Adelaide Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, 37a Woodville Rd, Woodville South, South Australia, 5011, Australia.
Queen Elizabeth Hospital · AUUniversity of Adelaide · AUBasil Hetzel Institute · AURoyal Australasian College of Surgeons · AUSouth Australian Health and Medical Research Institute · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMobile X-ray services (MXS) could be used to investigate clinical issues in aged care residents within familiar surroundings, reducing transfers to and from emergency departments and enabling healthcare to be delivered in residential aged care facilities. There is however little research exploring consumer perspectives about such services. The objective of this research was to explore the perspectives and preferences of residents about the provision of MXS in residential aged care facilities, including their knowledge about the service, perceived benefits, and factors that require consideration for effective implementation.

methodsA qualitative study design was used. The setting for the study included four residential aged care facilities of different sizes from different parts of a South Australian city. Purposive sampling was used to recruit participants. 16 residents participated in semi-structured interviews that were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were inductively derived using thematic analysis.

resultsParticipants had a mean age of 85 years, 56% were female, 25% had dementia and 25% had had a mobile X-ray in the last 12 months. Four themes were developed. Participants preferred mobile X-rays, provided as healthcare-in-place, to improve accessibility to them and minimize physical and psychological discomfort. Participants had expectations about the processes for receiving mobile X-rays. Costs of X-rays to people, family and society were a consideration. Decision making required residents be informed about mobile X-rays.

conclusionsResidents have positive views of MXS as they can receive healthcare-in-place, with familiar people and surroundings. They emphasised that MXS delivered in residential aged care facilities need to be of equivalent quality to those found in other settings. Increased awareness of mobile X-ray services is required.

Indexed as

Homes for the AgedNursing HomesAgedAged, 80 and overAustraliaDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansMaleQualitative ResearchResidential FacilitiesX-RaysDelivery of healthcareHealthy ageingHospitalsNursing homesX-ray

Identifiers

PMID35752763
PMCPMC9233760
OpenAlexW4283461924

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.