Trial reportBMC pregnancy and childbirth2022
Delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping for near-term infants born to preeclamptic mothers; a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04193345 (The Maternal and Neonatal Impact of Early Versus Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping Among Pregnant Severe Preeclampsia Patients Delivered by Cesarean Section), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Maternal and Neonatal Impact of Early Versus Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping Among Pregnant Severe Preeclampsia Patients Delivered by Cesarean Section
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Umbilical cord milking and delayed cord clamping for the prevention of neonatal hypoglycaemia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2024Pooled it
- From knowledge to action: understanding midwives' challenges in implementing delayed cord clamping in Northern Ghana.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Article
- Maternal Outcomes Associated with Delayed Cord Clamping in Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Cross-Sectional Study.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a postpartum hemorrhage risk prediction model for advanced maternal age women undergoing vaginal delivery: a comparison of multiple machine learning algorithms.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to assess delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping in preeclamptic mothers undergoing scheduled caesarean delivery regarding the maternal intra-operative blood loss and neonatal outcomes.
methodsA clinical trial was conducted on 62 near-term preeclamptic mothers (36-38
resultsThere was not any significant difference between the two groups regarding the maternal estimated blood loss (P=0.673), the rates of PPH (P=0.1), post-delivery haemoglobin (P=0.154), and haematocrit values (P=0.092). Neonatal outcomes also were showing no significant difference regarding APGAR scores at the first minute (P=1) and after 5 minutes (P=0.114), day 1 serum bilirubin (P=0.561), day 3 serum bilirubin (P=0.676), and the rate of NICU admission (P=0.671). However, haemoglobin and haematocrit values were significantly higher in the DCC group than in the ECC group (P<0.001).
conclusionThere is no significant difference between DCC and ECC regarding maternal blood loss. However, DCC has the advantage of significantly higher neonatal haemoglobin.
trial registrationIt was first registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 10/12/2019 with registration number NCT04193345.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.