Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35752748›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Transition from da Vinci to Versius robotic surgical system: initial experience and outcomes of over 100 consecutive procedures.

Ahmed A Hussein, Rehan Mohsin, Harris Qureshi, Riaz Leghari, Zhe Jing, Yousuf O Ramahi, Irfan Rizvi, Khurshid A Guru, Adib Rizvi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Systematic Review and Clinical Outcomes of new Robotic Systems in Urology.International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology
    Pooled it
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ahmed A HusseinDepartment of Urology, A.T.L.A.S (Applied Technology Laboratory for Advanced Surgery) Program, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm & Carlton St Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.
Rehan MohsinSindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan.
Harris QureshiSindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan.
Riaz LeghariSindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan.
Zhe JingDepartment of Urology, A.T.L.A.S (Applied Technology Laboratory for Advanced Surgery) Program, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm & Carlton St Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.
Yousuf O RamahiDepartment of Urology, A.T.L.A.S (Applied Technology Laboratory for Advanced Surgery) Program, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm & Carlton St Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA.
Irfan RizviMid Atlantic Permanente Medical Group PC, McLean, VA, 22102, USA.
Khurshid A GuruDepartment of Urology, A.T.L.A.S (Applied Technology Laboratory for Advanced Surgery) Program, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm & Carlton St Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA. Khurshid.guru@roswellpark.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4551-4676
Adib RizviSindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation, Karachi, 74200, Pakistan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to describe the development of the robotic urology program at Sindh Institute of Urology and Transplantation (SIUT) and the feasibility of transitioning from the da Vinci to Versius robotic systems. The SIUT robotics program began in 2017 utilizing the da Vinci Si robotic system, transitioning to the Versius system in 2021. Retrospective review of our quality assurance database was performed. All procedures performed utilizing the two systems were identified, analyzed, and compared. Data were described with descriptive statistics. Matched procedures (by type of procedure) performed by the same surgeons utilizing the da Vinci and Versius were compared. All tests were double-sided with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.106 cases were performed by the Versius robotic surgical system in 2021. Median age was 42 years (IQR 26-56), and 69 (65%) were males. Procedures included both benign (83%) and malignant disorders (17%), several upper tract (75%), and pelvic/lower tract (25%). No major intraoperative complications were observed. Conversion to open occurred in six procedures. Malfunction of the robotic arms occurred in two procedures: the erroneous bedside units (BSU) were replaced. Eight patients developed postoperative high-grade complications. Matched analysis of various procedures (pyeloplasty, stone surgery, radical, partial, and simple nephrectomy) showed no significant difference in perioperative outcomes. To our knowledge, this is the first and largest series of urologic procedures performed by the Versius robotic surgical system.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyRoboticsRobotic Surgical ProceduresAdultFemaleHumansKidneyMaleNephrectomyPostoperative ComplicationsCystectomyda VinciNephrectomyRoboticSurgical systemsVersius

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.