Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35752629›Full record

ArticleNature communications2022

Echolocation-related reversal of information flow in a cortical vocalization network.

Francisco García-Rosales, Luciana López-Jury, Eugenia González-Palomares, Johannes Wetekam, Yuranny Cabral-Calderín, Ava Kiai, Manfred Kössl, Julio C Hechavarría

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Neuronal activity underlying vocal production in bats.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Oscillatory Waveform Shape and Temporal Spike Correlations Differ across Bat Frontal and Auditory Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Francisco García-RosalesInstitut für Zellbiologie und Neurowissenschaft, Goethe-Universität, 60438, Frankfurt/M, Germany. francisco.garcia-rosales@esi-frankfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5576-2967
Luciana López-JuryInstitut für Zellbiologie und Neurowissenschaft, Goethe-Universität, 60438, Frankfurt/M, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-9384-2586
Eugenia González-PalomaresInstitut für Zellbiologie und Neurowissenschaft, Goethe-Universität, 60438, Frankfurt/M, Germany.
Johannes WetekamInstitut für Zellbiologie und Neurowissenschaft, Goethe-Universität, 60438, Frankfurt/M, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1919-3140
Yuranny Cabral-CalderínResearch Group Neural and Environmental Rhythms, Max Planck Institute for Empirical Aesthetics, 60322, Frankfurt/M, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5497-9360
Ava KiaiInstitut für Zellbiologie und Neurowissenschaft, Goethe-Universität, 60438, Frankfurt/M, Germany.
Manfred KösslInstitut für Zellbiologie und Neurowissenschaft, Goethe-Universität, 60438, Frankfurt/M, Germany.
Julio C HechavarríaInstitut für Zellbiologie und Neurowissenschaft, Goethe-Universität, 60438, Frankfurt/M, Germany. hechavarria@bio.uni-frankfurt.de.ORCID 0000-0001-9277-2339

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian frontal and auditory cortices are important for vocal behavior. Here, using local-field potential recordings, we demonstrate that the timing and spatial patterns of oscillations in the fronto-auditory network of vocalizing bats (Carollia perspicillata) predict the purpose of vocalization: echolocation or communication. Transfer entropy analyses revealed predominant top-down (frontal-to-auditory cortex) information flow during spontaneous activity and pre-vocal periods. The dynamics of information flow depend on the behavioral role of the vocalization and on the timing relative to vocal onset. We observed the emergence of predominant bottom-up (auditory-to-frontal) information transfer during the post-vocal period specific to echolocation pulse emission, leading to self-directed acoustic feedback. Electrical stimulation of frontal areas selectively enhanced responses to sounds in auditory cortex. These results reveal unique changes in information flow across sensory and frontal cortices, potentially driven by the purpose of the vocalization in a highly vocal mammalian model.

Indexed as

Auditory CortexChiropteraEcholocationAcousticsAcoustic StimulationAnimalsMammalsVocalization, Animal

Identifiers

PMID35752629
PMCPMC9233670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.