Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35752428›Full record

ArticleNeuroscience2022

Comparison of Golgi-Cox and Intracellular Loading of Lucifer Yellow for Dendritic Spine Density and Morphology Analysis in the Mouse Brain.

Courtney K Walker, Kelsey M Greathouse, Evan Liu, Hamad M Muhammad, Benjamin D Boros, Cameron D Freeman, Jung Vin Seo, Jeremy H Herskowitz

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Near-Freezing-Temperature Golgi Neuronal Staining for X-ray Imaging of Human Brain.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cross-Platform Synaptic Network Analysis of Human Entorhinal Cortex Identifies TWF2 as a Modulator of Dendritic Spine Length.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Courtney K WalkerCenter for Neurodegeneration and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Kelsey M GreathouseCenter for Neurodegeneration and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Evan LiuCenter for Neurodegeneration and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Hamad M MuhammadCenter for Neurodegeneration and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Benjamin D BorosCenter for Neurodegeneration and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Cameron D FreemanCenter for Neurodegeneration and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Jung Vin SeoCenter for Neurodegeneration and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA.
Jeremy H HerskowitzCenter for Neurodegeneration and Experimental Therapeutics, Department of Neurology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, USA. Electronic address: jhersko@uab.edu.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

Systems Genetic Analysis of Cognitive Resilience Using Multi-Parent CrossesRF1AG063755 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KACZOROWSKI, CATHERINE COOK · 2019 to 2021
$7.2M
Identifying therapeutic targets that confer synaptic resilience to Alzheimer's diseaseR01AG061800 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Christopher A. Gaiteri, Jeremy H. Herskowitz · 2018 to 2026
$6.9M
UAB Research Training Program in Neurobiology of Cognition and Cognitive DisordersT32NS061788 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI Farah Dominique Lubin · 2008 to 2026
$4.5M
UAB Alzheimer's Disease Research CenterP20AG068024 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI GELDMACHER, DAVID S · 2020 to 2022
$3.3M
Targeting Rho Kinases for Alzheimer's disease TherapeuticsR01AG054719 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI HERSKOWITZ, JEREMY H. · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Pathologic tau and dendritic spine loss in Alzheimer's diseaseF31AG067635 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI WALKER, COURTNEY KAITLIN · 2020 to 2021
$75k
NIA NIH HHS F31 AG067635NIA NIH HHS P20 AG068024NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054719NIA NIH HHS R01 AG061800NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG063755NINDS NIH HHS T32 NS061788
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dendritic spines are small protrusions on dendrites that serve as the postsynaptic site of the majority of excitatory synapses. These structures are important for normal synaptic transmission, and alterations in their density and morphology have been documented in various disease states. Over 130 years ago, Ramón y Cajal used Golgi-stained tissue sections to study dendritic morphology. Despite the array of technological advances, including iontophoretic microinjection of Lucifer yellow (LY) fluorescent dye, Golgi staining continues to be one of the most popular approaches to visualize dendritic spines. Here, we compared dendritic spine density and morphology among pyramidal neurons in layers 2/3 of the mouse medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) and pyramidal neurons in hippocampal CA1 using three-dimensional digital reconstructions of (1) brightfield microscopy z-stacks of Golgi-impregnated dendrites and (2) confocal microscopy z-stacks of LY-filled dendrites. Analysis of spine density revealed that the LY microinjection approach enabled detection of approximately three times as many spines as the Golgi staining approach in both brain regions. Spine volume measurements were larger using Golgi staining compared to LY microinjection in both mPFC and CA1. Spine length was mostly comparable between techniques in both regions. In the mPFC, head diameter was similar for Golgi staining and LY microinjection. However, in CA1, head diameter was approximately 50% smaller on LY-filled dendrites compared to Golgi staining. These results indicate that Golgi staining and LY microinjection yield different spine density and morphology measurements, with Golgi staining failing to detect dendritic spines and overestimating spine size.

Indexed as

Dendritic SpinesPyramidal CellsAnimalsDendritesHippocampusIsoquinolinesMiceIsoquinolineslucifer yellowdendritic spineGolgi stainingHippocampusLucifer yellowmorphometryprefrontal cortex

Identifiers

PMID35752428
PMCPMC9420811
OpenAlexW4283323036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.